首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology >Performance Analysis of an LAA and WiFi Coexistence System Using the LAA Category-4 LBT Procedure With GAP
【24h】

Performance Analysis of an LAA and WiFi Coexistence System Using the LAA Category-4 LBT Procedure With GAP

机译:LAA和WIFI共存系统使用LAA类别-4 LBT程序具有GAP的性能分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

LTE LAA listen-before-talk (LBT) procedures have been considered a promising solution to reasonable coexistence of LTE with other access technologies in unlicensed spectrum. An issue that arises with the LAA LBT procedures is the so-called GAP period, which may largely degrade the performance of a coexistence system. There are two methods to deal with the GAP period. Method 1 is to fill in the channel during a GAP period by using a reservation signal, while Method 2 takes no action but just listens to the channel during a GAP period. Most existing analytical models for the LAA LBT procedures are inaccurate because they do not take into account the GAP period. This paper studies the modeling of the LAA category-4 LBT procedure in an LAA and WiFi coexistence system and investigate the impact of the GAP period on the system performance. A 2-D Markov chain is built to model the category-4 LBT procedure of an LAA eNodeB, considering the effect of the GAP period. Based the Markov model, analytical models are further derived to investigate the throughput and packet delay performance of the coexistence system with Method 1 and Method 2, respectively. Numerical results show that with Method 1, the performance of an LAA eNodeB is similar to that of a WiFi AP in terms of the transmission probability and packet delay. With Method 2, the performance of an LAA eNodeB is worse than that of a WiFi AP.
机译:LTE LAA聆听谈话(LBT)程序已被视为有希望的解决方案,可以在未经许可的频谱中与其他访问技术合理地共存。由LAA LBT程序出现的问题是所谓的差距期,可能在很大程度上降低了共存系统的性能。有两种方法可以处理差距。方法1是通过使用预留信号在间隙时段期间填充信道,而方法2不采用任何动作,而只是在间隙时段期间倾听信道。 LAA LBT程序的大多数现有的分析模型是不准确的,因为它们没有考虑到差距期。本文研究了LAA和WIFI共存系统中LAA类别-4 LBT程序的建模,并调查了差距期对系统性能的影响。考虑到差距期的效果,构建了一个2-D马尔可夫链以模拟LAA eNodeB的类别-4 LBT程序。基于Markov模型,进一步推导出分析模型,以研究与方法1和方法2的共存系统的吞吐量和分组延迟性能。数值结果表明,利用方法1,在传输概率和分组延迟方面,LAA eNodeB的性能类似于WiFi AP的性能。利用方法2,LAA eNodeB的性能比WiFi AP的性能更差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号