...
首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology >Reply to 'Comments on 'New method of performance analysis for diversity reception with correlated Rayleigh-fading signals''
【24h】

Reply to 'Comments on 'New method of performance analysis for diversity reception with correlated Rayleigh-fading signals''

机译:答复“关于'具有相关瑞利衰落信号的分集接收性能分析新方法的评论'”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Fang et al. (2000) attempted to simplify the procedures of performance analysis for maximal ratio combining (MRC), selection combining (SC), and equal gain combining (EGC) diversity systems of two correlated Rayleigh-fading channels by using a known transformation technique. It was then found by Loyka et al. (for comment see ibid., vol. 52, no. 3, p. 725-726 (2003)) that this transformation technique is correct for MRC, but leads to some performance-prediction deviations for SC and EGC diversity systems compared to the results produced by other reported approaches. Because the transformation process redistributes the signal energy among different antennas, the bit error ratio (BER) achieved after the transformation may be different from that without transformation. For SC and EGC, the transformation technique can provide the same BER as that achieved without the transformation technique when the correlation is not strong and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is large (p2 8 dB, for example). In the case of small SNR and strong correlation, desirable performance gain in BER can be achieved by the transformation technique for the SC diversity system. However, the transformation technique produces an undesirable performance loss in terms of the BER for the EGC diversity system. It is not sufficient to use one example, as in Loyka et al. (fig. 2), to assess when the transform technique for SC predicts performance that deviates from reported approaches.
机译:方等。 (2000)试图通过使用已知的变换技术来简化两个相关瑞利衰落信道的最大比合并(MRC),选择合并(SC)和等增益合并(EGC)分集系统的性能分析过程。然后由Loyka等人发现。 (有关评论,请参见同上,第52卷,第3期,第725-726页(2003年)),该转换技术对于MRC是正确的,但与SC和EGC分集系统相比,会导致一些性能预测偏差其他报告的方法产生的结果。由于变换过程会在不同天线之间重新分配信号能量,因此变换后获得的误码率(BER)可能与未变换时的误码率不同。对于SC和EGC,当相关性不强且信噪比(SNR)大(例如p2 8 dB)时,该变换技术可以提供与不使用该变换技术所获得的BER相同的BER。在SNR小且相关性强的情况下,可通过SC分集系统的转换技术在BER中获得理想的性能增益。然而,就EGC分集系统而言,就BER而言,转换技术产生了不希望的性能损失。仅使用一个例子是不够的,例如Loyka等人。 (图2),以评估SC的转换技术何时能够预测与报告的方法有所不同的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号