首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication >Community of Practice and Professionalization Perspectives on Technical Communication in Ireland
【24h】

Community of Practice and Professionalization Perspectives on Technical Communication in Ireland

机译:爱尔兰技术交流的实践和专业化社区观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Research problem: In Ireland, technical communication has developed as an academic and occupational field since the late 20th century. Research on the field in Ireland is limited. Research questions: (1) To what extent do technical communicators in Ireland operate as a community of practice? (2) What steps are Irish technical communicators taking toward professionalization? Literature review: This study uses a theoretical framework that combines symbolic interactionism and communities of practice theories. While traditional professionalization theory uses a structural functionalist approach to the study of occupations, characterizing disciplines as professions depending on whether they meet certain traits (including autonomy, market closure, license to practice, and service orientation), symbolic interactionism prioritizes interactions among individuals. In this sense, it overlaps with the concerns of communities of practice. A community of practice involves a group of people working together, and creating meaning through their interactions. Studying an occupation through this lens foregrounds individual and community identity, and how that is formed and informed by work. Methodology: Mixed methods—a survey, focus groups, and interviews—were used to explore Irish technical communicators' perceptions of aspects of their field: practice, education, value and status, and professional and community structures. Results: The findings indicate that Irish technical communicators exhibit traits of communities of practice (such as joint enterprise and shared repertoires). They also identify with their job title and practice. A key finding is that some Irish technical communicators have a keen appetite for community involvement. This enthusiasm notwithstanding, barriers to professionalization include low visibility of the role in Ireland, limited evidence of professionalizing activity, and the pot- ntial for career stagnation.
机译:研究问题:自20世纪末以来,在爱尔兰,技术交流已发展为一个学术和职业领域。爱尔兰在该领域的研究有限。研究问题:(1)爱尔兰的技术交流员在多大程度上作为实践社区运作? (2)爱尔兰技术交流员朝专业化迈出了哪些步骤?文献综述:本研究使用了一个理论框架,该框架结合了象征性的互动主义和实践理论共同体。传统的专业化理论使用结构功能主义的方法来研究职业,但根据学科是否符合某些特征(包括自治权,市场封闭,执业许可和服务取向)将学科定性为职业,而符号互动主义则将个人之间的互动置于优先地位。从这个意义上讲,它与实践社区的关注重叠。实践社区涉及一群人一起工作,并通过他们的互动来创造意义。通过这种视角来研究职业,将凸显个人和社区的身份,以及职业是如何形成和提供这种身份的。方法:用于调查,焦点小组和访谈的混合方法被用来探索爱尔兰技术传播者对其领域的看法:实践,教育,价值和地位以及专业和社区结构。结果:研究结果表明,爱尔兰的技术交流者表现出实​​践社区的特征(例如,合资企业和共享曲目)。他们还以自己的职务和实践来识别。一个关键的发现是,一些爱尔兰技术传播者对社区参与有着强烈的兴趣。尽管有这种热情,职业化的障碍包括在爱尔兰所扮演角色的知名度低,职业化活动的证据有限以及职业停滞的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号