...
首页> 外文期刊>Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on >Required: Three hours in technical communications — Paradigm for a paradox
【24h】

Required: Three hours in technical communications — Paradigm for a paradox

机译:要求:三个小时的技术交流-矛盾的范式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

It seem paradoxical that industry indicates that engineers need communication skills, and universities appear to agree, but that universities allocate little time in the curriculum to train engineers in written communications. This paper identifies that paradox and stresses that in response to limitations of time, the technical communications teacher must design an introductory course which reflects current research in communications and teaching methodology. The course must serve the engineering student efficiently and effectively. One such design for the beginning course is presented. Centering the introductory course on the feasibility report and shorter accompanying reports serves the engineer by permitting the design of a report which serves the reader. Such design demonstrates the writing process and dramatises the relationship between the student-writer and the reader-client.
机译:行业似乎表明工程师需要沟通技巧,而大学似乎也同意,但是大学在课程中很少分配时间来培训工程师进行书面沟通,这似乎是自相矛盾的。本文指出了这一悖论,并强调指出,为了响应时间的限制,技术交流老师必须设计一个入门课程,以反映当前在交流和教学方法方面的研究。该课程必须有效地为工程专业的学生提供服务。提出了一个针对此类课程的设计。将入门课程的重点放在可行性报告和简短的随附报告上,允许设计适合读者的报告,从而为工程师服务。这样的设计演示了写作过程,并戏剧化了学生-作者和读者-客户之间的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号