首页> 外文期刊>Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on >A Comparison of Regularization Techniques for Magnetoencephalography Source Reconstruction
【24h】

A Comparison of Regularization Techniques for Magnetoencephalography Source Reconstruction

机译:脑磁图源重建的正则化技术比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, the abilities of the generalized cross validation (GCV) method and the L-curve method for the determination of the optimal regularization parameter are studied and compared for magnetoencephalography (MEG) source reconstruction. The results verify that the GCV method is a better choice when the measurement noise is relatively high, and the L-curve method seems to be more effective when the source is mainly dominated by errors such as brain perturbation.
机译:本文研究了通用交叉验证(GCV)方法和L曲线方法确定最佳正则化参数的能力,并将其与脑磁图(MEG)源重建进行了比较。结果证明,当测量噪声相对较高时,GCV方法是更好的选择,而当信号源主要由诸如脑动量之类的误差主导时,L曲线方法似乎更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号