...
首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Magnetics >A Comparison of Single-Layer Coaxial Coil Mutual Inductance Calculations Using Finite-Element and Tabulated Methods
【24h】

A Comparison of Single-Layer Coaxial Coil Mutual Inductance Calculations Using Finite-Element and Tabulated Methods

机译:有限元法和列表法计算单层同轴线圈互感的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Quick and accurate methods to calculate the mutual inductance of coaxial single layer coils remains important to this day in a large variety of engineering and physical disciplines. While modern finite-element electromagnetic field codes can do this accurately, the engineer often requires only a first- or second-order estimate before proceeding to the numerical analysis stage. Grover's tabular data, developed in the first half of the 20th century, remains the standard for manually calculating mutual inductance for a wide variety of coil and wire forms. This investigation reports the accuracy of mutual inductance calculations for single-layer coaxial coils based on Grover's tables when compared to estimates obtained with a finite-element electromagnetic field code (FEEFC). Since it is impractical to construct and characterize the numerous coils needed for this type of investigation, the FEEFC results are treated as actual inductance measurements. Grover reported his tabular data to be accurate within five significant digits excluding the cases when the coils are loosely coupled and when the coils are short. This investigation found Grover's tabular method to be inaccurate for loosely coupled and short coils, but also found that significant error for closely coupled coils as well. The maximum error between Grover's tabular method and the FEEFC results is 9.8%. Knowing the error associated with Grover's method and the coil geometry for which the error occurs is an important aid for the engineer and scientist.
机译:如今,在众多工程和物理学科中,快速,准确的方法来计算同轴单层线圈的互感仍然很重要。尽管现代的有限元电磁场代码可以准确地做到这一点,但工程师在进行数值分析阶段之前通常只需要一阶或二阶估计即可。 Grover在20世纪上半叶开发的表格数据仍然是手动计算各种线圈和电线形式的互感的标准。这项研究报告了基于格罗弗表的单层同轴线圈互感计算的准确性,与使用有限元电磁场代码(FEEFC)获得的估计值相比。由于构造和表征此类研究所需的大量线圈是不切实际的,因此将FEEFC结果视为实际电感测量值。 Grover报告说,他的表格数据在五个有效数字内是准确的,但不包括线圈松散耦合和线圈短路的情况。这项研究发现,对于松耦合和短线圈,格罗弗的表格方法是不准确的,但对于紧密耦合的线圈,也发现了显着的误差。 Grover的表格方法与FEEFC结果之间的最大误差为9.8%。知道与格罗弗方法有关的误差以及发生该误差的线圈几何形状对于工程师和科学家而言是重要的帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号