首页> 外文期刊>Hydrological ProcHydrological Processesrnesses >INFERRING HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES IN A TEMPERATE BASIN USING ISOTOPIC AND GEOCHEMICAL HYDROGRAPH SEPARATION: A RE‐EVALUATION
【24h】

INFERRING HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES IN A TEMPERATE BASIN USING ISOTOPIC AND GEOCHEMICAL HYDROGRAPH SEPARATION: A RE‐EVALUATION

机译:利用同位素和地球化学水文分离法推断温带盆地的水文过程:重新评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Simultaneous monitoring of conservative and non-conservative tracers in streamflow offers a valuable means of obtaining information on the age and flow paths of water reaching the basin outlet. Previous studies of stormflow generation in a small forested basin on the Canadian Shield used isotopic (IHS) and geochemical hydrograph separations (GHS) to infer that some event water during snowmelt reaches the stream via subsurface pathways, and that surface water runoff is generated by direct precipitation on to saturated areas (DPSA) in the stream valley. These hypotheses were tested for rainfall inputs using simultaneous IHS (O) and GHS (dissolved silica) of basin stormflow, supplemented by hydrochemical and hydrometric data from throughflow troughs installed on basin slopes. Comparison of pre-event and subsurface water hydrographs did not provide conclusive evidence for subsurface movement of event water to the stream, owing to the appreciable uncertainty associated with the hydrograph separations. However, IHSs of runoff at the soil–bedrock interface on basin slopes indicated that event water comprised 25–50% of total runoff from areas with deep soil cover, and that these contributions supplied event water flux from the basin in excess of that attributable to DPSA. The surface water component of stormflow estimated from the GHS was also largely the result of DPSA. GHS assumes that dissolved silica is rapidly and uniformly taken up by water infiltrating the soil and that water moving via surface pathways retains the low dissolved silica level of rainfall; however, neither assumption was supported by the hillslope results. Instead, results suggest that the observed depression of silica levels in basin stormflow previously attributed to dilution by DPSA was partly a function of transport of dilute event water to the channel via preferential pathways. Implications of these results for the general use of simultaneous IHS and GHS to infer hydrological processes are discussed. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:同时监测水流中保守和非保守示踪剂,为获得有关流域出口水的年龄和流径的信息提供了宝贵的手段。以前在加拿大盾构上的一个小森林流域产生暴雨流量的研究使用同位素(IHS)和地球化学水位图分离(GHS)来推断融雪过程中的某些事件水通过地下途径到达溪流,而地表径流是由直接产生的。降水流到河谷的饱和区(DPSA)。这些假说使用流域暴雨的同时IHS(O)和GHS(溶解二氧化硅)进行了降雨输入测试,并通过安装在流域斜坡上的通流槽的水化学和水文数据进行了补充。由于水位图分离存在明显的不确定性,因此事前和地下水位图的比较没有提供事件水在地下流向河流的结论性证据。但是,盆地斜坡土壤-基岩界面的径流IHSs表明,事件水占土壤深覆盖地区径流总量的25-50%,这些贡献使盆地的事件水通量超过了可归因于径流的水流。 DPSA。根据全球统一制度估计的暴雨地表水成分也很大程度上是DPSA的结果。 GHS假设溶解的二氧化硅被渗透到土壤中的水迅速而均匀地吸收,并且通过表面路径流动的水保持了较低的溶解二氧化硅水平。但是,这两个假设都没有得到坡度结果的支持。相反,结果表明,先前归因于DPSA稀释的盆地暴雨中观测到的二氧化硅含量下降,部分原因是稀水通过优先途径向通道输送。讨论了这些结果对同时使用IHS和GHS推断水文过程的意义。 ©1997,John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号