首页> 外文期刊>Hydrological ProcHydrological Processesrnesses >Hydrological response of an afforested catchment in a Mediterranean humid mountain area: a comparative study with a natural forest
【24h】

Hydrological response of an afforested catchment in a Mediterranean humid mountain area: a comparative study with a natural forest

机译:地中海湿润山区造林流域的水文响应:与天然林的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The effects of afforestation on water resources are still controversial. The aim of this paper is to (i) analyse the hydrological response of an afforested area in the Central Pyrenees and (ii) compare the hydrological response of an afforested area with the response observed in a natural undisturbed forest. The Araguás catchment was cultivated until the 1950s, and then afforested with pines in an effort to control the active degradation processes. The hydrological response was variable and complex, because the discharge was generated by a combination of distinct runoff processes. The hydrological response showed that (i) afforestation produced moderate peak discharges, stormflows and recession limbs, and long rising limbs; (ii) no one single variable was able to explain the hydrological response: rainfall volume and intensity did not explain the hydrological response and antecedent rainfall and initial discharge (indicating antecedent moisture conditions) did play an important role; (iii) seasonal differences were observed suggesting different runoff generating processes; and (iv) the effect of forest cover on peak discharges became less important as the size of the hydrological event increased. The stormflow coefficient showed a clear seasonal pattern with an alternation between a wet period, when the catchment was hydrologically responsive, and a dry summer period when the catchment rarely responded to any event, and two transitional periods (wetting and drying). Compared with a natural forest, the afforested area recorded greater flows and peak discharges, faster response times and shorter recession limbs. Afforestation reduces the water yield and the number of floods compared with non-vegetated areas and abandoned lands. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:造林对水资源的影响仍然存在争议。本文的目的是(i)分析比利牛斯山脉中部一个造林区的水文响应,以及(ii)将一个造林区的水文响应与在自然未扰动森林中观察到的响应进行比较。 Araguás流域的耕种一直持续到1950年代,然后在松树上绿化,以控制活跃的退化过程。水文响应是变化和复杂的,因为流量是由不同的径流过程共同产生的。水文响应表明:(i)造林产生了中等的高峰流量,暴风雨和衰退四肢,以及长肢上升; (ii)没有一个单一的变量能够解释水文响应:降雨量和强度不能解释水文响应,而前期降雨和初始流量(表明前期湿度条件)确实起着重要作用; (iii)观察到季节差异,表明径流产生过程不同; (iv)随着水文事件规模的增加,森林覆盖对高峰流量的影响变得不那么重要了。雨水流量系数显示出明显的季节性模式,在集水区对水文有响应的湿润期和集水区几乎不响应任何事件的夏季干旱期之间有交替,并有两个过渡期(湿润和干燥)。与天然林相比,绿化面积的流量更大,流量峰值最大,响应时间更快,衰退肢较短。与非植被区和荒地相比,绿化减少了水的产量和洪水的数量。版权所有©2016 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号