首页> 外文期刊>Human Nature >How Willing Are You to Accept Sexual Requests from Slightly Unattractive to Exceptionally Attractive Imagined Requestors?
【24h】

How Willing Are You to Accept Sexual Requests from Slightly Unattractive to Exceptionally Attractive Imagined Requestors?

机译:您如何愿意接受从略微没有吸引力到极具吸引力的想象中的请求者的性要求?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In their classic study of differences in mating strategies, Clark and Hatfield (1989, Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 2, 39–54) found that men and women demonstrated a striking difference in interest in casual sex. The current study examined the role of an imagined requestor’s physical attractiveness (slightly unattractive, moderately attractive, and exceptionally attractive) on men’s and women’s willingness to accept three different requests (go out, come to apartment, go to bed) as reflected in answers to a questionnaire. We tested two hypotheses with a sample of 427 men and 443 women from three countries. Hypothesis 1 states that men, relative to women, will demonstrate a greater willingness to accept the “come to apartment” and “go to bed” requests but not the “go out” request for all three levels of requestor attractiveness. This hypothesis reflects Clark and Hatfield’s main findings. Hypothesis 2 states that the physical attractiveness of a potential partner will have a greater effect on women’s than on men’s willingness to accept all three requests, and particularly for the explicit request for casual sex. The results partially supported Hypothesis 1 and fully supported Hypothesis 2. The discussion highlights limitations of the current research and presents directions for future research.
机译:Clark和Hatfield(1989,Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality,2,39-54)在关于交配策略差异的经典研究中发现,男女对随意性的兴趣表现出惊人的差异。当前的研究检查了想象中的请求者的身体吸引力(略微缺乏吸引力,中等吸引力和异常吸引力)对男人和女人愿意接受三个不同请求(外出,上房,上床)的意愿的作用,如对问卷。我们用来自三个国家的427名男性和443名女性的样本检验了两个假设。假设1指出,相对于女性,男人将表现出更大的意愿接受“到公寓”和“上床”的请求,而不是接受所有三个级别的请求者吸引力的“出去”请求。这一假设反映了克拉克和哈特菲尔德的主要发现。假设2指出,潜在伴侣的身体吸引力对女人的影响大于对男人接受所有三个要求的意愿的影响,特别是对于随意性行为的明确要求。结果部分支持假设1,完全支持假设2。讨论突出了当前研究的局限性,并提出了未来研究的方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号