...
首页> 外文期刊>Human Dimensions of Wildlife >Balancing Stakeholders With An Imbalanced Budget: How Continued Inequities In Wildlife Funding Maintains Old Management Styles
【24h】

Balancing Stakeholders With An Imbalanced Budget: How Continued Inequities In Wildlife Funding Maintains Old Management Styles

机译:在预算不平衡的情况下平衡利益相关者:野生动物资金的持续不平等如何保持旧的管理风格

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Decker and associates (Decker,Krueger,Baer,Knuth,& Richmond,1996) called for wildlife professionals to fully embrace a stakeholder approach to management.This new approach should replace the previous tradition in wildlife management,in which 'expert' managers catered to the interests of their traditional 'clients,' (i.e.,the hunters,anglers,and trappers who paid for wildlife management through taxes and fees).Values toward wildlife have become more diverse in recent decades,with rapid growth in the animal welfare and animal rights movements (Muth & Jamison,2000).
机译:Decker及其同事(Decker,Krueger,Baer,Knuth和Richmond,1996年)呼吁野生动植物专业人士全面采用利益相关者的管理方法。这种新方法应取代野生动植物管理中的传统,“传统”管理者应迎合这一传统。他们传统的“客户”的利益(即通过税收和收费为野生动物管理付费的猎人,垂钓者和诱捕者)。近几十年来,随着动物福利和动物的快速增长,对野生动植物的价值变得更加多样化。权利运动(Muth&Jamison,2000)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号