首页> 外文期刊>Housing, theory and society >Housing Benefit Reform and the Private Rented Sector in the UK: On the Deleterious Effects of Short-term, Ideological 'Knowledge'
【24h】

Housing Benefit Reform and the Private Rented Sector in the UK: On the Deleterious Effects of Short-term, Ideological 'Knowledge'

机译:英国的住房福利改革与私人租赁部门:论短期意识形态“知识”的有害影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper draws on the figurational sociology of Norbert Elias in understanding the current housing crisis in the UK: one which emphasizes the social interdependencies between individuals and groups, and the power relations that characterize them, in explaining household behaviour. It is argued that such an approach can contribute to a better understanding of housing processes and their differentiated outcomes. At the same time, this analysis exposes the myriad negative consequences that emerge from short-term housing policies based on static, over-simplified assumptions and applied to an ever-increasingly complex housing figuration, which is constantly in flux. These arguments are made with reference to empirical evidence on the impact of changes to housing benefit in the private rented sector, which shows how neoliberal housing policy contributes to long-term detrimental effects on marginalized households and groups. Through this example, it is argued that the governmental presentation of welfare reforms differs markedly from the reality of consequences on the ground and corresponds to "neoliberal state-crafting". It is suggested that any approach to understanding the complexities of the housing system must retain a focus on historical change, precedents and fluctuations in power balances to avoid the pernicious "retreat into the present" characteristic of policy.
机译:本文借鉴了诺伯特·埃利亚斯(Norbert Elias)的比喻社会学,以理解英国当前的住房危机:在解释家庭行为时,强调了个人和群体之间的社会相互依存以及代表他们的权力关系。有人认为,这种方法可有助于更好地了解住房进程及其差异化结果。同时,该分析揭示了基于静态,过度简化的假设的短期住房政策所产生的无数负面影响,这些负面影响被应用于不断变化的,越来越复杂的住房形象。这些论点是参考经验性证据得出的,这些经验对私人租赁部门的住房收益变化的影响产生了影响,表明新自由主义住房政策如何对边缘化家庭和群体产生长期的有害影响。通过这个例子,有人认为政府对福利改革的表述与实地后果的现实情况明显不同,并且对应于“新国家造势”。建议任何了解住房制度复杂性的方法都必须关注历史变化,权力平衡的先例和波动,以避免政策的有害的“退缩到现在”特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号