...
首页> 外文期刊>Housing studies >Defining and Measuring Displacement: Is Relocation from Restructured Neighbourhoods Always Unwelcome and Disruptive?
【24h】

Defining and Measuring Displacement: Is Relocation from Restructured Neighbourhoods Always Unwelcome and Disruptive?

机译:定义和衡量流离失所:从重组后的街区进行搬迁是否总是不受欢迎且具有破坏性?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Current regeneration policy has been described as 'state-led gentrification', with comparisons made with the 'social disruption' caused by slum clearance of the 1950s and 1960s. This article takes issue with this approach in relation to the study of the restructuring of social housing areas. The terms 'forced relocation' and 'displacement' are often too crude to describe what actually happens within processes of restructuring and the effects upon residents. Displacement in particular has important dimensions other than the physical one of moving. Evidence from a recent study of people who have moved out of restructured areas shows that although there is some evidence of physical displacement, there is little evidence of social or psychosocial displacement after relocation. Prior attitudes to moving and aspects of the process of relocation-the degree of choice and distance involved-are important moderators of the outcomes. Issues of time and context are insufficiently taken into consideration in studies and accounts of restructuring, relocation and displacement.
机译:当前的再生政策被描述为“国家主导的高档化”,并与1950年代和1960年代贫民窟清除造成的“社会破坏”进行了比较。本文在社会住房领域的重组研究中对此方法提出了质疑。术语“强迫搬迁”和“流离失所”通常过于粗糙,无法描述重组过程中实际发生的情况以及对居民的影响。位移尤其具有重要的尺寸,而不是运动的物理尺寸。最近对搬出改建地区的人们进行的一项研究表明,尽管有一些肢体流离失所的证据,但很少有迁徙后发生社会或心理社会流离失所的证据。先前对移动的态度和迁移过程的各个方面(选择的程度和所涉及的距离)是结果的重要调节者。在研究和重组,搬迁和流离失所的研究中,没有充分考虑到时间和背景问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号