【24h】

ZONING

机译:分区

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Appeals Court Found Massachusetts Board of Selectmen Worked with Objectors to Bar Application for Certificate of Appropriateness for Multifamily Project Without Basis The Court of Appeals of Massachusetts ruled that various abutters to a multifamily property whose owner sought to increase the number of structures on an existing property in an existing multifamily housing district was denied an application for a certificate of appropriateness for the project in an unreasonable, arbitrary and capricious fashion, where the abutters worked the neighborhood historic preservation district to ban the project without factual basis. Meehan v. Somer-ville Historic Preservation Commission, 2020 WL 2071040 (Table), No. 19-P-211 (Mass. App. Ct. Apr. 30, 2020). Gerald Meehan acquired title to a 25,000 square foot parcel on Aldersey Street in Somerville in 1999. The property with a three-unit residential structure is the largest in the multifamily residential building neighborhood. In 2001, he proposed a nine-unit project on the site, which failed because of significant community and neighborhood opposition. In the spring of 2002, he proposed a 30-unit housing development, which also met with neighborhood opposition.
机译:上诉法院发现Massachusetts Selecter委员会与反对者致力于借助于Massachusetts的上诉法院统治多法项目的拟准确性证书的申请,该垫料统治了各种越野,其主人旨在增加现有财产的结构数量现有的多摩性房区以不合理的,任意和反复性的方式予以申请,该项目的适当性证书,越野,越野致力于历史保存区,没有事实基础禁止项目。 Meehan v。Somer-Ville历史保存委员会,2020 WL 2071040(表),No.19-P-211(质量。应用程序。CT。4月30日,2020年)。 Gerald Meehan于1999年在Somerville的Alderey Street上获得了25,000平方英尺的包裹。拥有三个单位的住宅结构的酒店是多达林住宅建筑附近最大的房产。 2001年,他提出了该网站上的九个单位项目,因为重要的社区和邻居反对失败。在2002年春天,他提出了一个30单元的住房开发,也会遇到邻里的反对派。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号