...
【24h】

PREMISES LIABILITY

机译:房屋责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled that a cleaning person performing tasks at a condominium unit had no claim for premises liability as an invitee for falling on an ice patch in the driveway against the condominium association, where the worker failed to demonstrate that either path she could take from her car to the unit was equally likely to bring her into contact with hazardous ice and snow, and thus that the path she chose which led her to the ice patch was effectively unavoidable. Haggart v. Hills of Regency Condominium Association, (Not Reported in N.W. Rptr.), 2019 WL 845773, No. 341007 (Mich. App. Feb 21, 2019).
机译:密歇根州的上诉法院裁定,在公寓部门执行任务的清洁人员没有索赔作为落在车道上的冰块抵御公寓协会的车道上的邀请人,在那里,工人未能证明她可以的道路从她的汽车到这个单位同样可能让她与危险的冰雪接触,因此她选择的道路被带到冰贴片的道路有效地是不可避免的。 Haggart v.Regency Concominium Association的山丘,(未在N.W. RPTR报道),2019 WL 845773,No.341007(MICH。应用程序。2019年2月21日2月21日)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号