【24h】

SECTION 8

机译:第8节

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Johnson v. Paterson Housing Authority, 2019 WL 1439118, Civil Action No. 17-7514 (ES) (MAH) (unpublished) (D. N.J. Apr. 1, 2019) was a decision by the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey which found that a public housing authority violated a tenant's Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process rights by denying the tenant a hearing on the termination of her tenancy, after she complied with a written directive telling her she had the right to one if she requested it within seven days, which she did. The court barred the housing authority's motion to dismiss which argued that she had received a hearing on a demand for payment for payment of delinquent rent two years earlier, and that the statute of limitations for a Section 1983 cause of action for failure to grant a hearing was untimely because it came two years after the prior hearing.
机译:Johnson v.Paterson Housing Authority,2019 WL 1439118,民事诉讼第17-7514(ES)(MAH)号(未公布)(DNJ 2019年4月1日)是美国新泽西州地方法院的一项裁决,在她遵守书面指示告诉她她有权在7天内提出要求之后,发现公共住房当局违反了租户的《第十四条修正案》程序正当程序权,剥夺了租户终止租约的听证会。 ,她做到了。法院禁止房屋委员会的驳回动议,该动议辩称她两年前已收到关于要求支付拖欠租金的付款的听证会,并且针对第1983条的诉讼理由未进行听证会的时效规定是不合时宜的,因为是在上次听证会之后的两年。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号