首页> 外文期刊>Higher Education in Europe >New Forms of International Cooperation in Doctoral Training: Internationalisation and the International Doctorate - One Goal, Two Distinct Models 1
【24h】

New Forms of International Cooperation in Doctoral Training: Internationalisation and the International Doctorate - One Goal, Two Distinct Models 1

机译:博士培训国际合作的新形式:国际化和国际博士学位-一个目标,两个截然不同的模式1

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Although the idea of a European doctorate has been discussed since the earliest years of the European Union it is only very recently that its time has finally come. This progress is the product of the efforts of a number of important players, including the European Commission, the European University Association, the main representative of institutions of higher education awarding doctoral degrees in Europe, and the Bologna Process. In synergy with the European Research Area's goals, the Bologna Process, in particular, has played a vital role in providing a new impulse to internationalisation of the doctorate in Europe. Despite the important steps already achieved towards the joint European doctorate, full recognition of its legal value is still a work in progress. Problems arise because of the national laws of some European Union members, but are also due to a still pervasive conservative view in European higher education that encourages academic 'protectionism' instead of promoting cooperation. The two main reasons for resistance to innovative joint doctoral programmes remain, however, the misinterpretation of international mobility as the goal rather than one of the strategic tools of doctoral training and a widespread fear that harmonisation will homogenise the diversity of European doctoral curricula, reducing its current richness to uniformity.
机译:尽管自欧洲联盟最早以来就一直在讨论欧洲博士学位的想法,但它的时机终于到了不久。这一进步是许多重要参与者努力的产物,其中包括欧洲委员会,欧洲大学协会,授予欧洲博士学位的高等教育机构的主要代表以及博洛尼亚进程。与欧洲研究区的目标协同作用,特别是博洛尼亚进程在为欧洲博士学位国际化提供新动力方面发挥了至关重要的作用。尽管已经朝着获得联合欧洲博士学位的方向迈出了重要一步,但对其法律价值的全面承认仍在进行中。问题的产生是由于某些欧盟成员国的国内法,也是由于欧洲高等教育中仍然普遍存在着一种保守的观点,即鼓励学术上的“保护主义”而不是促进合作。抵制创新的联合博士课程的两个主要原因仍然存在,然而,国际流动性被误解为目标而不是博士培训的战略工具之一,并且普遍担心统一化将使欧洲博士课程的多样性趋于同质,从而减少了博士课程的多样性。当前对统一性的丰富程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号