首页> 外文期刊>Herald of Library Science >SOME REFLECTIONS ON MAINTAINING QUALITY IN LIBRARY SERVICES
【24h】

SOME REFLECTIONS ON MAINTAINING QUALITY IN LIBRARY SERVICES

机译:关于维护图书馆服务质量的几点思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Quality is described in many different ways, something that is unique and of a higher standard than other similar products or services and has to be always aimed at satisfying expectations and demands of user through constant monitoring and continuous improvement. Library is more like a service institution which generates very little money out of its service and often has very poor infrastructure, resources and less number of competent manpower. While other researchers in the area of service quality have focused their qualitative inquiries upon the providers of service, LibQUAL+™ tool by the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) and Texas A&M University stresses on user judgment of service quality. LibQUAL+™ Surveys were conducted annually to assess service quality in research libraries in the US, and results of these surveys are followed up seriously to bridge the gap in access and services. However such serious and continuous studies in estimating service quality in libraries are yet to pickup in our country. In the absence of such studies, at best what we can do is to follow up the tool formulated in LibQUAL+™ to have an empirical estimate of where our libraries stand or how best the existing state of affairs can be improved by resorting to refined practices. Typically for a library in the country, time, cost, availability and extensibility may be vital parameters to ensure and judge quality in services, subject to the limitations on infrastructure in terms of space, collection, computer, and manpower. Some strategies to maintain service quality in different sections in a library such as acquisition, processing, circulation, automation, electronic information services are elaborated with a checklist to quantify service quality out of the turn-around time for various operations and services. The study ends by identifying some of the problems in ensuring qualitative services such as funds, support, staff, infrastructure, collection, policy, priority etc.
机译:质量以多种不同的方式来描述,这是独一无二的,并且其质量比其他类似产品或服务更高,并且必须始终通过不断监控和持续改进来满足用户的期望和要求。图书馆更像是一个服务机构,其服务收入很少,而且其基础设施,资源和可胜任的人力资源也很少。服务质量领域的其他研究人员将定性查询的重点放在服务提供者上,而研究图书馆协会(ARL)和德克萨斯A&M大学的LibQUAL +™工具则强调用户对服务质量的判断。每年进行LibQUAL +™调查以评估美国研究图书馆的服务质量,并且认真跟踪这些调查的结果以弥合访问和服务方面的差距。然而,在我国,对于评估图书馆服务质量的这种认真而持续的研究尚未得到应用。在没有此类研究的情况下,最多只能采取跟进LibQUAL +™中制定的工具,以实证评估我们的图书馆的位置或通过采用完善的做法如何最好地改善现有状况。通常,对于该国的图书馆而言,时间,成本,可用性和可扩展性可能是确保和判断服务质量的关键参数,但要受基础结构在空间,馆藏,计算机和人力方面的限制。制定了一些策略来维护图书馆中不同部分的服务质量,例如获取,处理,流通,自动化,电子信息服务,并附有核对表以量化各种操作和服务的周转时间之外的服务质量。该研究首先确定了在确保定性服务方面的一些问题,例如资金,支持,人员,基础设施,征收,政策,优先级等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号