首页> 外文期刊>Heat and mass transfer >Turbulent flow investigation inside and outside plain-orifice atomizers with rounded orifice inlets
【24h】

Turbulent flow investigation inside and outside plain-orifice atomizers with rounded orifice inlets

机译:带有圆形孔口的平孔雾化器内外的湍流研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The performances of three linear eddy viscosity models (LEVM) and one algebraic Reynolds stress model (ARSM) on the simulation of the internal and external flows in the plain-orifice atomizers with rounded orifice inlets are evaluated. The validity of the computational model is first assessed through the testing of a backward facing step flow, a sudden expansion pipe flow and a liquid column collapsing problem. Then the atomizer internal and external flows are analyzed by comparing the computed discharge coefficients with available experimental data and by comparing the turbulence intensity profiles at the orifice exit. The results are also illustrated by the fluid/air interface plot. It is found that the turbulence models investigated exhibit zonal behaviors, i.e., none of the models investigated performs well throughout the entire flow field. It is worthwhile to note that the standard k-∈ model is not necessarily the worst among the models investigated. In average, the ARSM model gives better results as compared to the standard k-∈ model and the low Reynolds number models. The turbulence strength has a significant influence on the global characteristics of the flow field. The models with better predictions of the turbulence kinetic energy, such as Gatski-Speziale's ARSM model and Nagano-Hishida's low Reynolds number model, can yield better predictions of the global characteristics of the flow field, e.g., the reattachment lengths for the backward-facing step flow and the sudden expansion pipe flow, and the discharge coefficient for the atomizer flow.
机译:评估了三个线性涡流粘度模型(LEVM)和一个代数雷诺应力模型(ARSM)在带圆孔入口的平孔雾化器内部和外部流动模拟上的性能。首先通过测试朝后的阶跃流量,突然的膨胀管流量和液柱塌陷问题来评估计算模型的有效性。然后,通过将计算出的排放系数与可用的实验数据进行比较,并通过比较孔口出口处的湍流强度曲线,来分析雾化器的内部和外部流量。流体/空气界面图也说明了结果。发现所研究的湍流模型表现出区域行为,即,所研究的模型均未在整个流场中表现良好。值得指出的是,在研究的模型中,标准k-ε模型不一定是最差的。平均而言,与标准k-ε模型和低雷诺数模型相比,ARSM模型可提供更好的结果。湍流强度对流场的整体特性有重要影响。对湍流动能有更好预测的模型,例如Gatski-Speziale的ARSM模型和长野-ish田的低雷诺数模型,可以对流场的整体特征做出更好的预测,例如,向后流动的重新附着长度阶跃流量和突然膨胀的管道流量,以及雾化器流量的排放系数。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Heat and mass transfer》 |2005年第9期|p.810-823|共14页
  • 作者

    Chun-Lang Yeh;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Aeronautical Engineering, National Formosa University, Huwei, Yunlin 632, Taiwan, R.O.C;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 力学;工业技术;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号