首页> 外文期刊>Health system >Analysing repeated hospital readmissions using data mining techniques
【24h】

Analysing repeated hospital readmissions using data mining techniques

机译:使用数据挖掘技术分析重复住院的再次入院

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Few studies have examined how to identify future readmission of patients with a large number of repeat emergency department (ED) visits. We explore 30-day readmission risk prediction using Microsoft's AZURE machine learning software and compare five classification methods: Logistic Regression, Boosted Decision Trees (BDTs), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Bayes Point Machine (BPM), and Two-Class Neural Network (TCNN). We predict the last readmission visit of frequent ED patients extracted from the electronic health records of their 8455 penultimate visits. The methods show differential improvement, with the BDT indicating marginally better AUC (area under the ROC curve) than logistic regression and BPM, followed by the TCNN and SVM. A comparison of BDT and Logistic Regression results for correct and incorrect classification highlights the similarities and differences in the significant predictors identified by each method. Future research may incorporate time-varying covariates to identify other longitudinal factors that can lead to readmission risk reduction.
机译:很少有研究检查过如何确定经过多次急诊就诊的患者是否再次入院。我们使用Microsoft的AZURE机器学习软件探索了30天的再入院风险预测,并比较了五种分类方法:逻辑回归,增强决策树(BDT),支持向量机(SVM),贝叶斯点机(BPM)和两类神经网络(TCNN)。我们预测从他们的8455次倒数第二次就诊的电子健康记录中提取的频繁ED患者的最后一次再入院。这些方法显示出不同的改进,其中BDT表示比逻辑回归和BPM略好于AUC(ROC曲线下的面积),其次是TCNN和SVM。 BDT和Logistic回归结果对正确和不正确分类的比较突出显示了每种方法识别的重要预测变量的相似点和不同点。未来的研究可能会纳入随时间变化的协变量,以识别可能导致再入院风险降低的其他纵向因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号