首页> 外文期刊>Health, Risk & Society >Drugs, risk and society: Government, governance or governmentality?
【24h】

Drugs, risk and society: Government, governance or governmentality?

机译:毒品,风险与社会:政府,治理还是政府性?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This themed issue of Health, Risk & Society on Drugs, Risk and Society brings together six articles reflecting the importance of drugs in the study of health risks. The articles fall into three groups. The articles by Davis and Abraham (20114. Davis , C. and Abraham , J. 2011 . A comparative analysis of risk management strategies in European Union and United States pharmaceutical regulation . Health, Risk & Society , 13 ( 5 ) : this issue [Taylor & Francis Online]View all references) and Gardner and Drew (20115. Gardner , J. G. and Drew , K. 2011 . The Eltroxin controversy: Risk, and how actors construct their world . Health, Risk & Society , 13 ( 5 ) : this issue [Taylor & Francis Online]View all references) explore the government of risk and the ways in which regulators use scientific expertise to identify and control risks. Both articles show the limitations of such expertise and the influence of other processes. Davis and Abraham (20114. Davis , C. and Abraham , J. 2011 . A comparative analysis of risk management strategies in European Union and United States pharmaceutical regulation . Health, Risk & Society , 13 ( 5 ) : this issue [Taylor & Francis Online]View all references) examine the ways in which political pressure on the US Federal and Drug Administration has made it more sympathetic to pharmaceutical companies. Gardner and Drew (20115. Gardner , J. G. and Drew , K. 2011 . The Eltroxin controversy: Risk, and how actors construct their world . Health, Risk & Society , 13 ( 5 ) : this issue [Taylor & Francis Online]View all references) analyse the ways in which regulators in New Zealand were forced to respond to patient and media claims that a new formulation of Eltroxin caused side effects even though there was no scientific evidence for such claims. The second group of articles (Himmelstein et al. 20117. Himmelstein , M. 2011 . Over-the-counter cough and cold medicines for children: A comparison of UK and US parents’ parental usage, perception and trust in governmental health organisation . Health, Risk & Society , 13 ( 5 ) : this issue [Taylor & Francis Online]View all references, Jin et al. 20119. Jin , C. 2011 . Framing a global health risk from the bottom-up: User perceptions and practices around antibiotics in four villages in China . Health, Risk & Society , 13 ( 5 ) : this issue [Taylor & Francis Online]View all references) explore the governance of drugs and the ways in which governments seek to influence drug use through public health measures. This approach involves the sharing of the responsibility for the management of the potentially harmful effects of drugs with experts providing potential users with information on these effects and encouraging rational and the responsible use of drugs. Both articles show that this approach is likely to have limited effects if it does not address the underlying reasons for drug misuse, in the case of Chinese villages the pressure on local doctors to prescribe and sell antibiotics to their patients to maintain their incomes (Jin et al. 20119. Jin , C. 2011 . Framing a global health risk from the bottom-up: User perceptions and practices around antibiotics in four villages in China . Health, Risk & Society , 13 ( 5 ) : this issue [Taylor & Francis Online]View all references), or there is a lack of awareness or trust of the source of information, as is the case of parents in the UK and US buying over-the-counter cough and cold medicines for their young children (Himmelstein et al. 20117. Himmelstein , M. 2011 . Over-the-counter cough and cold medicines for children: A comparison of UK and US parents’ parental usage, perception and trust in governmental health organisation . Health, Risk & Society , 13 ( 5 ) : this issue [Taylor & Francis Online]View all references). If governments and their agents disregard individual understanding and perceptions they can be seen as using risk to construct social problems; those threatening the established order of society. The papers in the final section of this issue consider ways in which individual drug users resist such control and develop their own assessment of risk and their own patterns of drug use. Harrison and her colleagues (20117. Himmelstein , M. 2011 . Over-the-counter cough and cold medicines for children: A comparison of UK and US parents’ parental usage, perception and trust in governmental health organisation . Health, Risk & Society , 13 ( 5 ) : this issue [Taylor & Francis Online]View all references) consider the Australian government efforts to control the consumption of alcohol, in order to minimise its harmful effects and in particular to reduce young people's harmful ‘binge’ drinking habits. The participants in this study saw themselves as engaging in ‘controlled drunkenness’. These young people were interested in the pleasurable not the harmful aspects of alcohol consumption. In terms of the public health guidelines, most of these young people were binge drinking however they saw their drinking as reasonable and safe. McGovern and McGovern (201111. McGovern , R. and McGovern , W. 2011 . Voluntary risk-taking and heavy-end crack cocaine use: An edgework perspective . Health, Risk & Society , 13 ( 5 ) : this issue [Taylor & Francis Online]View all references) examine crack cocaine: an illegal ‘heavy-end’ drug which drug regulators consider causes considerable harm to its users and others and wish to prohibit. However for the crack cocaine users it was a purposeful activity. It enabled users to create meaning in otherwise meaningless lives. Crack cocaine enabled individuals to develop and demonstrate specialist and valued skills and knowledge and negotiate the dangerous ‘edge’ inherent in heavy-end crack cocaine use and control the uncontrollable.
机译:本期《健康,药物风险与社会,风险与社会》主题期刊共收录了六篇文章,反映了药物在健康风险研究中的重要性。文章分为三组。 Davis和Abraham撰写的文章(20114. Davis,C.和Abraham,J. 2011.欧盟和美国药品法规中风险管理策略的比较分析。健康,风险与社会,第13(5)期:此问题[泰勒和弗朗西斯在线] [查看所有参考文献]和Gardner和Drew(20115. Gardner,JG和Drew,K. 2011. Eltroxin争议:风险以及行为者如何构建自己的世界。健康,风险与社会,13(5):本期杂志(Taylor&Francis Online)(查看所有参考资料)探讨了风险管理以及监管机构利用科学专业知识来识别和控制风险的方式。这两篇文章都显示了这种专业知识的局限性以及其他过程的影响。 Davis和Abraham(20114. Davis,C.和Abraham,J. 2011.欧盟和美国药品法规中风险管理策略的比较分析。健康,风险与社会,13(5):此问题[Taylor&Francis在线]查看所有参考资料)研究了美国联邦和药品管理局对政治压力使其对制药公司更加同情的方式。 Gardner and Drew(20115. Gardner,JG和Drew,K. 2011. Eltroxin争议:风险,以及行为者如何构建自己的世界。健康,风险与社会,13(5):此问题[Taylor&Francis Online]查看全部参考资料)分析了新西兰监管者被迫对患者和媒体声称新的Eltroxin制剂引起副作用的方式作出反应的方式,尽管没有科学证据支持此类说法。第二组文章(Himmelstein等,20117。Himmelstein,M。2011。针对儿童的非处方止咳药和感冒药:英国和美国父母对父母的用法,对政府卫生组织的看法和信任的比较。健康,风险与社会,第13(5)期:此问题[Taylor&Francis Online]查看所有参考文献,Jin等人20119. Jin,C. 2011。从下至上构筑全球健康风险:用户的看法和做法关于中国四个村庄的抗生素的研究,健康,风险与社会,13(5):本期[泰勒和弗朗西斯在线]查看所有参考文献)探讨了药物治理以及政府寻求通过公共卫生影响药物使用的方式措施。这种方法涉及与专家共同分担管理药物潜在有害作用的责任,向潜在使用者提供有关这些作用的信息,并鼓励合理和负责任地使用药物。这两篇文章都表明,如果这种方法不能解决滥用药物的根本原因,那么这种方法的效果可能有限。在中国村庄,当地医生承受着向医生开处方并向患者出售抗生素以维持其收入的压力(Jin et al。 et al。20119. Jin,C. 2011.自下而上地构筑全球健康风险:中国四个村庄的用户对抗生素的认知和实践。《健康,风险与社会》,第13期(5):本期[Taylor&Francis [在线]查看所有参考文献),或者缺乏对信息来源的认识或信任,例如英国和美国的父母为年幼的孩子购买非处方止咳药和感冒药(Himmelstein等et al。20117. Himmelstein,M. 2011.儿童非处方止咳药和感冒药:英国和美国父母对父母的父母使用,对政府卫生组织的看法和信任的比较。卫生,风险与社会,13( 5):本期[泰勒和法郎在线]查看所有参考。如果政府及其代理人无视个人的理解和看法,则可以将其视为利用风险制造社会问题;那些威胁社会既定秩序的人。本期最后一节中的论文考虑了个体吸毒者抵制这种控制并开发自己的风险评估和自己的吸毒方式的方式。 Harrison和她的同事们(20117. Himmelstein,M. 2011。儿童非处方止咳药和感冒药:英国和美国父母对父母的父母使用,对政府卫生组织的看法和信任的比较。健康,风险与社会,13(5):此问题[Taylor&Francis Online](查看所有参考文献)考虑了澳大利亚政府为控制酒精消费量所做的努力,以最大程度地减少其有害影响,尤其是减少年轻人的有害“暴饮暴食”。 ™饮酒习惯。这项研究的参与者认为自己正在从事“控制性醉酒”活动。这些年轻人对愉快而不是有害的饮酒感兴趣。在公共卫生准则方面,这些年轻人大多数都是暴饮暴食,但他们认为自己的饮酒是合理且安全的。 McGovern和McGovern(201111. McGovern,R.和McGovern,W. 2011。自愿承担风险和使用重度可卡因:边缘工作视角。健康,风险与社会,13(5):此问题[Taylor和Francis在线]上查看所有参考资料)检查可卡因:一种可被药物监管机构认为对使用者和其他人造成相当大危害并希望禁止的非法“重磅”药物。但是,对于可卡因使用者来说,这是有目的的活动。它使用户能够在原本毫无意义的生活中创造意义。裂解可卡因使个人能够发展和展示专家和有价值的技能和知识,并能解决重型裂解可卡因使用中固有的危险“边缘”并控制不可控制的情况。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Health, Risk & Society》 |2011年第5期|p.389-396|共8页
  • 作者

    Andy Alaszewski;

  • 作者单位

    Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号