首页> 外文期刊>Health Policy and Planning >A conceptual and analytical approach to comparative analysis of country case studies: HIV and TB control programmes and health systems integration
【24h】

A conceptual and analytical approach to comparative analysis of country case studies: HIV and TB control programmes and health systems integration

机译:对国家案例研究进行比较分析的概念和分析方法:艾滋病毒和结核病控制规划与卫生系统整合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Attempts to comparatively analyse large-scale communicable disease control programmes have, for the most part, neglected the wider health system contexts within which the programmes lie. In addition, many evaluations of the integration of vertical disease control programmes into health systems have focused on single case studies or on a limited number of cases, or, when large numbers of cases were drawn upon, have been presented as a compendium of monographs rather than a systematic cross-national comparison. One reason for this may be that appropriate theories and tools for comparative health systems analysis are rare and difficult to formulate. In this paper we propose a conceptual framework and an analytical methodology which might be used to comparatively analyse a series of case studies that explore health systems, communicable diseases programmes and concepts of integration in order to make systematic comparisons to offer novel insights, to test new theories and to offer new hypotheses. We illustrate through a preliminary analysis how this framework can be applied to compare the impact of health systems integration and HIV and TB programmes in four countries in South-East Asia that were the subject of cases studies.
机译:对大型传染病控制计划进行比较分析的尝试在很大程度上已忽略了该计划所处的更广泛的卫生系统环境。此外,许多关于将垂直疾病控制计划纳入卫生系统的评估都集中在单个案例研究或有限数量的案例上,或者当大量案例被引用时,已被作为专论的纲要而提出。而不是系统的跨国比较。造成这种情况的原因之一可能是,用于比较性卫生系统分析的适当理论和工具很少见,而且难以制定。在本文中,我们提出了一个概念框架和一种分析方法,可用于比较分析一系列案例研究,这些案例研究探讨了卫生系统,传染病计划和整合概念,以便进行系统比较以提供新颖的见解,以测试新的理论并提供新的假设。我们通过初步分析说明了如何将该框架应用于案例研究对象的东南亚四个国家,以比较卫生系统整合以及艾滋病毒和结核病计划的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Health Policy and Planning》 |2010年第1期|p.21-31|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Communicable Diseases Policy Research Group, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand, 2Communicable Diseases Policy Research Group, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK, 3PhD candidate, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK, 4The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Geneva, Switzerland, 5Copenhagen School of Global Health, Copenhagen University, Denmark and 6Imperial College Business School, Imperial College, London, UK;

    Communicable Diseases Policy Research Group, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand, 2Communicable Diseases Policy Research Group, Department of Global Health and Development, Lond;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:17:33

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号