首页> 外文期刊>Health Care for Women International >Sex and Gender Traps and Springboards: A Focus Group Study Among Gender Researchers in Medicine and Health Sciences
【24h】

Sex and Gender Traps and Springboards: A Focus Group Study Among Gender Researchers in Medicine and Health Sciences

机译:性与性别陷阱和跳板:医学和健康科学领域性别研究人员的焦点小组研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We explored the difficulties that gender researchers encounter in their research and the strategies they use for solving these problems. Sixteen Swedish researchers, all women, took part in focus group discussions; the data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. The problems reported fell into four main categories: the ambiguity of the concepts of sex and gender; traps associated with dichotomization; difficulties with communication; and issues around publication. Categories of suggested problem-solving strategies were adaptation, pragmatism, addressing the complexities, and definition of terms. Here the specific views of gender researchers in medicine and health sciences—“medical insiders”—bring new challenges into focus.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2011.645970
机译:我们探讨了性别研究人员在研究中遇到的困难以及他们用于解决这些问题的策略。十六名瑞典妇女(全部为女性)参加了焦点小组讨论。使用定性内容分析法对数据进行分析。报告的问题分为四大类:性别概念的模棱两可;与二分法有关的陷阱;沟通困难;和有关出版的问题。建议的解决问题策略的类别包括适应,实用主义,解决复杂性和术语定义。在这里,医学和健康科学领域的性别研究人员的特殊观点–“医学内幕人士–”提出了新的挑战。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,service_compact: “ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2011.645970

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号