【24h】

No such animal

机译:没有这样的动物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

IBCs Concerns over the integrity of single trip IBCs have raised the issue that the regulations make no provision for such packagings. It is up to users to make sure their IBCs are fit for purpose, regardless of the basis on which they were sold, argues Martin Castle. For the transport of dangerous goods there is no provision in the regulations for any packaging type to be 'single trip' or 'single use' and therefore single trip intermediate bulk containers (IBCs) do not exist. In fact the UN text makes specific provision for the use of new, re-used, repaired and reconditioned packaging. Common sense says that a paper bag cannot be re-used but at the same time and taking into account the requirements for reducing packaging waste in a number of countries, not only in Europe, the UN recognises that the re-use of packagings assists in the process of protecting the environment. When this text was prepared over 30 years ago packaging waste was not a hot topic and it is more likely that the regulators were facing the real world in which packagings are re-used.
机译:中型散货箱对单程旅行的完整性的担忧提出了一个问题,即法规没有规定此类包装。马丁·卡斯尔(Martin Castle)认为,用户应确保自己的中型散货箱适合于目的,而不管其出售的依据如何。对于危险货物的运输,法规中没有规定任何包装类型均为“单程”或“单次使用”,因此不存在单程中型散装容器(IBC)。实际上,联合国案文对使用新的,重复使用的,经过修理和翻新的包装做出了具体规定。常识说,纸袋不能重复使用,但要同时考虑到许多国家(不仅在欧洲)减少包装浪费的要求,联合国认识到重复使用包装有助于保护环境的过程。在30年前编写此案文时,包装废弃物并不是一个热门话题,而监管机构更有可能面对重新使用包装的现实世界。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号