...
首页> 外文期刊>GSA Bulletin >Mappability, stratigraphic variation, and diagenetic problems in sedimentary map unit definition and field mapping
【24h】

Mappability, stratigraphic variation, and diagenetic problems in sedimentary map unit definition and field mapping

机译:沉积图单元定义和野外测绘中的可测性,地层变化和成岩问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Mapping, recognizing, and defining sedimentary formations in poorly exposed terrains, especially in units with significant stratigraphic variations and disparate definitive diagenetic characteristics, focuses attention on both the problems of field mapping and the contrast between classical field mapping practices and modern stratigraphic and sedimentological analyses. Field mappers must contend with issues of scale and mappability in defining formations, diagenetic versus primary depositional characteristics in delineating contacts, and facies changes, while making standard 1:24,000–1:25,000 scale maps. Formations were defined as mappable units, even before codification of stratigraphic practice, and pre–twentieth-century “legacy formations” remain as widely recognized units. Many “modern formations” recognized and defined in the late twentieth century also meet stratigraphic code definitions. However, postlegacy analyses of exceptionally well-exposed sections using new techniques and insights, while yielding knowledge of stratigraphic variability, may yield newly named, but not necessarily mappable “formations.” Resulting problems of formation recognition, formation definition, and field mapping of units and contacts on 1:24,000 or 1:25,000 scale maps are faced repeatedly by STATEMAP and other mappers. In some cases, mapping of “hybrid” formations, composed of two or more previously defined units is required. In other cases, stratigraphic position and general character must override details of type section stratigraphy in mapping formations. We recommend latitude in correlation with type sections and suggest that, while well-exposed sections provide important insights into paleoenvironments and stratigraphic variations, unless units are demonstrably mappable at the 1:24,000 or 1:25,000 scale, these variations should not be used to subdivide previously defined and mappable formations into new unmappable “formations.”
机译:绘制,识别和定义暴露不良的地形中的沉积物,特别是在地层变化显着且确定的成岩特征不同的单元中,将注意力集中在田间制图问题以及经典田野制图方法与现代地层学和沉积学分析之间的对比上。在制作标准的1:24,000–1:25,000比例尺地图时,现场绘图员必须在定义地层,界定接触中的成岩作用与主要沉积特征以及相变方面应对比例尺和可绘制性问题。即使在编纂地层实践之前,地层也被定义为可测绘单位,而20世纪前的“旧式地层”仍然是公认的单位。在二十世纪后期公认并定义的许多“现代构造”也符合地层规范定义。但是,使用新技术和新见识对异常暴露的断面进行遗留力分析,虽然可以得出地层变异性的知识,但可能会产生新命名的但不一定是可映射的“地层”。 STATEMAP和其他映射器会反复遇到在1:24,000或1:25,000比例尺地图上形成的编队识别,编队定义以及单位和联系人的野外映射问题。在某些情况下,需要映射由两个或多个先前定义的单元组成的“混合”地层。在其他情况下,地层位置和一般特征必须覆盖制图形式中类型剖面地层的细节。我们建议将纬度与类型剖面相关联,并建议,尽管曝光良好的剖面可提供有关古环境和地层变化的重要见解,除非可以将单位以1:24,000或1:25,000比例标明可映射,否则不应使用这些变化来细分先前定义和可映射的形式变为新的不可映射的“形式”。

著录项

  • 来源
    《GSA Bulletin》 |2012年第12期|p.1762-1772|共11页
  • 作者单位

    1Professor Emeritus, Department of Geology, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina 28608, USA, and Peridotite Publishers, 3327 Cypress Way, Santa Rosa, California 95405, USA 2Department of Geology, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina 28608, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号