...
首页> 外文期刊>GSA Bulletin >Field measurements of incision rates following bedrock exposure: Implications for process controls on the long profiles of valleys cut by rivers and debris flows
【24h】

Field measurements of incision rates following bedrock exposure: Implications for process controls on the long profiles of valleys cut by rivers and debris flows

机译:基岩暴露后切口速率的现场测量:对过程控制的影响由河流和泥石流切割的长谷

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Until recently, published rates of incision of bedrock valleys came from indirect dating of incised surfaces. A small but growing literature based on direct measurement reports short-term bedrock lowering at geologically unsustainable rates. We report observations of bedrock lowering from erosion pins monitored over 1–7 yr in 10 valleys that cut indurated volcanic and sedimentary rocks in Washington, Oregon, California, and Taiwan. Most of these channels have historically been stripped of sediment. Their bedrock is exposed to bed-load abrasion, plucking, and seasonal wetting and drying that comminutes hard, intact rock into plates or equant fragments that are removed by higher flows. Consequent incision rates are proportional to the square of rock tensile strength, in agreement with experimental results of others. Measured rates up to centimeters per year far exceed regional long-term erosion-rate estimates, even for apparently minor sediment-transport rates. Cultural artifacts on adjoining strath terraces in Washington and Taiwan indicate at least several decades of lowering at these extreme rates. Lacking sediment cover, lithologies at these sites lower at rates that far exceed long-term rock-uplift rates. This rate disparity makes it unlikely that the long profiles of these rivers are directly adjusted to either bedrock hardness or rock-uplift rate in the manner predicted by the stream power law, despite the observation that their profiles are well fit by power-law plots of drainage area vs. slope. We hypothesize that the threshold of motion of a thin sediment mantle, rather than bedrock hardness or rock-uplift rate, controls channel slope in weak bedrock lithologies with tensile strengths below 3–5 MPa. To illustrate this hypothesis and to provide an alternative interpretation for power-law plots of area vs. slope, we combine Shields' threshold transport concept with measured hydraulic relationships and downstream fining rates. In contrast to fluvial reaches, none of the hundreds of erosion pins we installed in steep valleys recently scoured to bedrock by debris flows indicate any postevent fluvial lowering. These results are consistent with episodic debris flows as the primary agent of bedrock lowering in the steepest parts of the channel network above 0.03–0.10 slope.
机译:直到最近,已公布的基岩谷切开速率 都来自于切开表面的间接测年。基于直接测量的一个很小但正在增长的 文学报道,短期基岩 的下降速度在地质上是不可持续的。我们报告了观察到的 基岩从侵蚀钉子在1–7 yr年监测到的10个山谷中的情况,这些山谷切割了俄勒冈州华盛顿的硬火山岩和沉积岩,加利福尼亚和台湾。历史上大多数 通道都被剥去了沉积物。 他们的基岩暴露于床层的磨蚀,拔毛和 季节性湿润和干燥,将坚硬的完整岩石 粉碎成板块或等量的碎片,这些碎片或碎片会被较高的流量去除。 相应的切开率与岩石抗张强度的平方成正比。 ,与其他实验结果 一致。甚至对于明显的 次要的泥沙输送速率,每年高达几厘米的测量速率也远远超过了 区域长期侵蚀率估计值。华盛顿和台湾毗邻的 梯田阶地上的文化文物表明,至少有几个 以这种极端的速度下降。由于缺乏沉积物 的覆盖,这些地点的岩性降低,其速率远超过 长期的岩石抬升速率。这种速率差异使得 不太可能以 预测的方式将这些河流的长剖面直接调整为 到基岩硬度或岩石上升速率根据流功率定律,尽管观察到 的剖面与流域 vs的幂律图非常吻合。坡。我们假设a 薄沉积幔的运动阈值而不是基岩硬度或岩石隆起 速率来控制具有 的弱基岩岩性中的河道斜率。低于3–5 MPa的抗拉强度。为了说明此假设 并为面积与坡度的幂律图 提供替代解释,我们将Shields的阈值传输概念 与测量的水力关系和下游的精炼 速率。与河流水域相比,我们最近在陡峭的山谷中安装的数百个冲刷销钉都被泥石流冲刷到了基岩,表明事件后河流的任何下降。 sup>这些结果与偶发性泥石流一致,因为 河道网络最陡峭部分的基岩 主剂降低,坡度在0.03-0.10以上。

著录项

  • 来源
    《GSA Bulletin》 |2005年第2期|174-194|共21页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA;

    Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA;

    Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA;

    Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA;

    Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号