The paradox of minibasin subsidence into salt: Clues to the evolution of crustal basins

摘要

Why do salt-floored minibasins subside? An almost universal explanation is that salt is forced from beneath the sinking basin by the weight of its sedimentary fill. This explanation is valid if the average density of the basin fill exceeds that of salt, which in the Gulf of Mexico needs at least 2300 m of siliciclastic fill to ensure enough compaction. However, most minibasins start sinking when they are much thinner than this. Some mechanism other than density inversion must explain the early history of these minibasins. Conventional understanding of minibasin subsidence is thus incomplete. Here, we identify five alternatives to density-driven subsidence of minibasins. (1) During diapir shortening, the squeezed diapirs inflate, leaving the intervening minibasins as bathymetric depressions. (2) In extensional diapir fall, stretching of a diapir causes it to sag, producing a minibasin above its subsiding crest. (3) During decay of salt topography, a dynamic salt bulge subsides as upward flow of salt slows, which lowers the salt surface below the regional sediment surface. (4) During sedimentary topographic loading, sediments accumulate as a bathymetric high above salt. (5) Finally, subsalt deformation affecting the base of salt may produce relief at the top of salt. Each mechanism (including density-driven subsidence) produces a different bathymetry, which interacts with sediment transport to produce different facies patterns in each type of minibasin. The particular mechanism for minibasin subsidence depends on the tectonic environment, regional bathymetry, and sedimentation rate. Their spatial variation on a continental margin creates provinces in which a given minibasin style is dominant. An appreciation of subsidence mechanisms should thus improve our understanding of minibasin fill patterns and allow genetic comparisons between minibasins.