首页> 外文期刊>Group decision and negotiation >Formation of Parties and Coalitions in Multiple Referendums
【24h】

Formation of Parties and Coalitions in Multiple Referendums

机译:在多个公民投票中形成各方和联盟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We consider a thought experiment in which voters could submit binary preferences regarding each of a pre-determined list of independent relevant issues, so that majorities could be tallied per issue. It might be thought that if such voting became technically feasible and widespread, parties and coalitions could be circumvented altogether and would become irrelevant. In this paper, we show, however, why and how voters would spontaneously self-organize into parties, and parties would self-organize into coalitions, prior to elections. We will see that such coordination is possible, even assuming very limited capabilities of communication and coordination. Using both analytical and empirical methods, we show that the average voter in a majority coalition would gain more than if no parties were formed, but the average voter overall (in or out of the coalition) would be worse off. Furthermore, the extent of these gains and losses is inversely proportional to the degree to which voters line along a unidimensional left-right axis.
机译:我们考虑一个思想实验,其中选民可以提交关于所有预先确定的独立相关问题列表中的二进制偏好,以便每个问题都可以缩短多数。有可能认为,如果这种投票成为技术上可行的,普遍存在的地方和联盟可以完全避免,并会变得无关紧要。在本文中,我们表明为什么和选民如何自发地自我组织成各方,并且在选举之前,各方将自组织成联盟。我们将看到这种协调是可能的,即使是沟通和协调的非常有限。使用分析和经验方法,我们表明,大多数联盟的平均选民将获得超过缔约方的比赛,但总体的平均选民(在联盟中)会更糟。此外,这些增益和损失的程度与选民沿着单向左右轴线的程度成反比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号