...
首页> 外文期刊>Ground water >Local Groundwater Withdrawal Permitting Laws in the South-Western US: California in Comparative Context
【24h】

Local Groundwater Withdrawal Permitting Laws in the South-Western US: California in Comparative Context

机译:美国西南部地区的当地地下水抽取许可法律:比较背景下的加利福尼亚

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) aims to control, for the first time in California's history, the state's significant use and depletion of groundwater. SGMA gives local agencies a high degree of discretion in relation to a new permitting power, but the discretion is a double-edged sword: agencies gain maximum flexibility to tailor their regime to local conditions, yet the statute provides no direction on appropriate components of a groundwater permitting regime. We introduce SGMA and the broader legislative context to its permitting power, and we explain the continuing common law context in which the legislation operates. This information is used as the foundation for a comparative legal analysis of fundamental elements of permitting regimes. We compare a selection of six other south-western permitting regimes established in legislation for areas recognized as requiring intensive management through permitting: special permitting areas (SPAs). We find that permitting regimes in south-western SPAs share a structure containing several almost universal elements, although the policy settings that apply to those elements vary widely. The established permitting regimes in the other south-western states' SPAs may inform Californian agencies seeking to use their new permitting power for the first time, as well as water agencies further afield, as to important components of a permitting regime, and the different policy settings that could apply to those components. Californian local agencies, and its Department of Water Resources, which is charged with providing local agencies technical advice, should have regard to these permitting possibilities.
机译:《可持续地下水管理法案》(SGMA)旨在控制加利福尼亚州历史上的第一次,该州对地下水的大量使用和消耗。 SGMA赋予地方机构关于新许可权的高度自由裁量权,但这种自由裁量权是一把双刃剑:机构获得最大的灵活性以根据当地情况调整其政权,但该法规未就资产负债表的适当组成部分提供任何指导地下水许可制度。我们将SGMA及其更广泛的立法环境介绍给它的许可权,并解释该立法在其中继续存在的普通法环境。这些信息被用作对许可制度基本要素进行比较法律分析的基础。我们比较了立法中针对认可的需要通过许可进行密集管理的区域中其他六个西南许可制度的选择:特殊许可区域(SPA)。我们发现,西南SPA中的许可制度共享一个包含几个几乎通用的要素的结构,尽管适用于这些要素的政策设置差异很大。西南其他州的SPA中已建立的许可制度可能会通知加利福尼亚州寻求首次使用其新许可权的机构以及更远的水机构关于许可制度的重要组成部分以及不同的政策可能适用于这些组件的设置。加利福尼亚地方机构及其负责向地方机构提供技术建议的水资源部应考虑这些许可的可能性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ground water》 |2016年第6期|747-753|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Law Sch, 185 Pelham St, Melbourne, Vic 3053, Australia;

    Woods Inst Environm, Civil & Environm Engn, 473 Via Ortega Dr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号