...
首页> 外文期刊>Granular matter >Review on testers for measuring flow properties of bulk solids
【24h】

Review on testers for measuring flow properties of bulk solids

机译:审查测量散装固体流动特性的测试仪

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The author was asked by the International Fine Particle Research Institue (IFPRI) to write a critical review on shear testers for IFPRI-members. The review was delivered to IFPRI in summer 1999. Following the contract with IFPRI it was not allowed to publish the review elsewhere for at least two years. Granular Matter invited the author to submit the review in the original form; during the refereeing process (besides other changes) it turned out that some remarks should be added here for clarification: - Since 1999, the author is not aware of a really new device for testing bulk solid properties, which could lead to a, change of the general comments and conclusions provided in the review. ― It was argued, that the review is referring too much to the work of Jenike, while the works of Johanson and Peschl were not adequately cited. Both are excellent engineers with a lot of experience, but their basic ideas are not available in published form, and if, they are not set in relation to alternative approaches so that an objective comparison in detail would be a future research issue rather than a topic in this report. ― A discussion on the influence of electrostatic charges was missing. There hardly is an influence, since the particles are in continuous contact. Only with non-conducting plastic particles electrostatic charges could cause problems. But no relevant experiments and results are known. In closed systems, the effect of electric charges is thus mainly neglected, but it is clear that electrostatic forces are eminent in flows with a free surface ― an issue not addressed in this review.
机译:国际精细颗粒研究所(IFPRI)要求作者为IFPRI成员撰写有关剪切测试仪的重要评论。该评论于1999年夏季交付给IFPRI。与IFPRI签订合同后,至少有两年时间不得在其他地方发表评论。 Granular Matter邀请作者以原始形式提交评论;在裁判过程中(除其他更改外),结果发现应在此处添加一些说明以进行澄清:-自1999年以来,作者并不知道真正的用于测试散装固体性质的设备,这可能会导致体积变化。审查中提供的一般性意见和结论。 ―有人认为,这次审查过多地提及了詹妮克的作品,而没有充分引用约翰逊和佩斯基尔的作品。两位都是具有丰富经验的优秀工程师,但是他们的基本思想无法以公开的形式获得,如果没有将其与替代方法结合使用,则详细的客观比较将是未来的研究问题,而不是主题。在这份报告中。 ―缺少关于静电荷影响的讨论。由于颗粒连续接触,几乎没有影响。仅对于不导电的塑料颗粒,静电荷可能会引起问题。但尚无相关实验和结果。因此,在封闭系统中,电荷的影响主要被忽略,但是很明显,具有自由表面的流动中会产生静电力,这是本综述未解决的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号