...
首页> 外文期刊>Government information quarterly >Assessing the authoritativeness of Canadian and American health documents: A comparative analysis using informetric methodologies
【24h】

Assessing the authoritativeness of Canadian and American health documents: A comparative analysis using informetric methodologies

机译:评估加拿大和美国卫生文件的权威性:使用信息计量学方法进行的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Government publications have long been considered authoritative sources of information regardless of the format (electronic via the WWW or paper) they are published in, and with little consideration as to how they are researched and written. Given the greater accessibility that the WWW provides the public to this very important source of information on a wide variety of subjects, assessing authoritativeness becomes a bigger and more difficult issue. The research and comparative analysis presented here continues a pilot study that applies informetric methods, especially citation analysis, to assess whether the blind trust afforded government publications is appropriate in such an important area of public policy and to see whether the two different types of health systems in Canada and the United States might have an effect on how these publications are produced.
机译:长期以来,政府出版物一直被认为是权威的信息来源,无论它们以何种格式(通过WWW或纸质形式以电子形式)发布,并且很少考虑如何进行研究和撰写。鉴于WWW为公众提供了有关各种主题的非常重要的信息源的更大的可访问性,评估权威性成为一个更大,更困难的问题。本文介绍的研究和比较分析是一项继续进行的试点研究,该研究采用了信息计量方法,尤其是引文分析,以评估在这种重要的公共政策领域中,政府提供的盲目信任政府出版物是否合适,并查看两种不同类型的卫生系统是否在加拿大和美国的出版可能会影响这些出版物的制作方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号