首页> 外文期刊>Globalizations >Reconfiguring the state: executive powers, emergency legislation, and neoliberalization in Italy
【24h】

Reconfiguring the state: executive powers, emergency legislation, and neoliberalization in Italy

机译:重新配置国家:意大利的行政权,紧急立法和新自由主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The article examines the evolution of legal and institutional mechanisms over four decades in Italy (1976-2015). Through an original data analysis of legislation on macroeconomic and financial measures, the paper investigates the reconfiguration of state institutions during the rise, consolidation and crisis of neoliberalism. I argue that the strengthening of the policy-making role of the executive, in particular through emergency legislation, proved to be key in the insulation and imposition of neoliberal and austerity policies. Furthermore, in the post-2008 period further coercive dynamics, such as the abuse of confidence question, the abuse of decree laws to impose austerity measures, and the constitutionalization of the balanced budget principle gained momentum. The data presented in this article also shows that the rise of executive power is paralleled by a gradual but steady marginalization of the policy-making role of the parliament, now often relegated to a mere ratifying institution of decisions taken elsewhere. Moreover, the growing tendency to resort to emergency and delegated legislation can be found in centre-left, centre-right and technocratic governments. Accordingly, the paper calls attention not only to the increasingly coercive legal and institutional dynamics that enshrine neoliberal policy-making, but also to an intrinsic and structural tension between the liberal democratic form of the state and increasingly authoritarian forms of neoliberalization.
机译:本文研究了意大利(1976年至2015年)过去40年中法律和体制机制的演变。通过对宏观经济和金融措施立法的原始数据分析,本文研究了新自由主义兴起,巩固和危机期间国家机构的重新配置。我认为,加强行政部门的决策作用,特别是通过紧急立法,是隔离和实施新自由主义和紧缩政策的关键。此外,在2008年后时期,诸如胁迫性问题的滥用,滥用财政紧缩法的法令以及平衡预算原则的宪法化等进一步的强制性动力。本文提供的数据还表明,行政权力的提高与议会决策作用的逐渐但稳定的边缘化同时发生,而现在议会的决策作用通常被归结为仅仅是在其他地方采取的批准机构。此外,在中左翼,中右翼和技术官僚政府中,越来越倾向于诉诸紧急情况和授权立法。因此,本文不仅呼吁重视新自由主义政策制定的日益强制性的法律和制度动力,而且要注意国家的自由民主形式与日益专制的新自由主义形式之间的内在和结构张力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号