...
首页> 外文期刊>Globalizations >Assessing the role of hope in processes of transitional justice: mobilizing and disciplining victims in Sierra Leone's truth commission and reparations programme
【24h】

Assessing the role of hope in processes of transitional justice: mobilizing and disciplining victims in Sierra Leone's truth commission and reparations programme

机译:评估希望在过渡时期司法进程中的作用:动员和惩戒塞拉利昂真相委员会和赔偿方案中的受害者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Existing studies have not been able to take the role of hope in processes of transitional justice (TJ) into account, as they focus on how TJ changes institutions and the relationships between individuals and therefore conclude that failed processes of TJ have no effect. In contrast to this approach, a different understanding of power as productive helps to understand how TJ-instruments create hope and which effects this has on how people conceive of themselves and the world they live in. A framework for analysing such processes is introduced that brings together individual meaning-making of hope and hopelessness with the role of the state in the provision of hope in the context of uncertainty. Transitional justice is therefore discussed as a performative project that aims at triggering specific emotions among the persons taking part in it and the broader society and at creating a vision of a better future based on social equality through the protection and fulfilment of human rights. By applying this framework to the case of the Sierra Leone truth and reconciliation commission and the reparations programme, it is argued that hope had a mobilizing as well as a disciplining function in these instruments. The promise of support mobilized victims to provide statements to the truth commission, and therefore enabled the commission to work in the first place. However, it failed in its attempt to discipline victims in their feelings about the past violence. The reparations programme constituted the embodiment of these promises, but victims interpreted its inadequate benefits and bad management as a proof that the state still does not care for them and competition over benefits is the norm despite their entitlement to support. This experience destroyed the hopes of many victims and created social envy among them, preventing the development of solidarity among victims and the chance for resistance against this policy.
机译:现有研究未能关注希望在过渡司法(TJ)过程中的作用,因为它们关注的是TJ如何改变制度和个人之间的关系,因此得出结论,失败的TJ过程没有任何作用。与这种方法相比,对权力作为生产力的不同理解有助于理解TJ仪器如何创造希望,以及这对人们如何看待自己和生活世界产生了哪些影响。引入了分析此类过程的框架,在不确定的情况下,将个人的希望和绝望的意义的产生与国家在提供希望中的作用结合在一起。因此,将过渡司法作为一个执行性项目进行讨论,其目的是在参与其中的人和更广泛的社会中引发特定的情感,并通过保护和实现人权,在社会平等的基础上建立更美好的未来。通过将这一框架适用于塞拉利昂真相与和解委员会以及赔偿方案,人们认为,希望在这些文书中既具有动员作用,又具有纪律作用。承诺的支持动员了受害者向真相委员会发表声明,因此使该委员会能够首先开展工作。但是,它未能按照受害者对过去暴力的感受来训练受害者。赔偿计划构成了这些承诺的体现,但受害者将其收益不足和管理不善解释为国家仍然不关心他们的证明,尽管有获得支持的权利,但对收益的竞争仍是常态。这种经历破坏了许多受害者的希望,并在其中造成了社会嫉妒,阻止了受害者之间团结的发展以及抵抗这一政策的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号