首页> 外文期刊>Global trade and customs journal >Access to EU Antidumping/Subsidy Confidential Files: The EU Law 'Zwartveld Sincere Cooperation Doctrine', Surprise What You Are Looking for Already Exists
【24h】

Access to EU Antidumping/Subsidy Confidential Files: The EU Law 'Zwartveld Sincere Cooperation Doctrine', Surprise What You Are Looking for Already Exists

机译:访问欧盟反倾销/补贴机密文件:欧盟法律“ Zwartveld真诚合作原则”令您正在寻找的东西感到惊讶

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

At the EU level the Administrative Protective Order (APO) is a long-standing theme which recurs on a regular basis among stakeholders and scholars.' Trade Defense Instruments ('TDI's') is namely the area where interested parties are lobbying for the introduction of an APO system. The goal is of course to bring more transparency in the EU anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigation regime which although appreciable for the quality of the EU officials involved, still leave the door open to criticism due to the lack of access to some information used in the investigation process. The introduction in the EU of an APO system similar to some extent to the one existing in the US could be a great step forward. However, some practical hurdles and a general political discontent in Brussels make the introduction of an APO regime extremely difficult. Not all is lost, however; as it will be introduced in this brief contribution, at EU level it already exists a means to ask for access to a confidential file in the hands of the EU institutions: the 'sincere cooperation' doctrine. The 'sincere cooperation' TEU is based on the doctrine and has been shaped in its scope by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). It does allow any interested parties via an EU domestic jurisdiction to request in compliance with full mutual respect existing between the EU and Member States, the assistance of the Brussels based institutions in order to access to a confidential file in the hands of the EU Institutions. The 'sincere cooperation' doctrine is not merely theoretical in fact it has been already successfully experimented in a limited number of cases by few trade lawyers. Perhaps, the effective answer to the call for transparency in TDI's is already in the 'EU house' and not in the yard of the neighbours.
机译:在欧盟一级,《行政保护令》(APO)是一个长期存在的主题,在利益相关者和学者中定期出现。贸易防御工具('TDI's)就是感兴趣的各方正在游说引入APO系统的领域。目标当然是要在欧盟的反倾销和反补贴调查制度中提高透明度,尽管该制度对于所涉欧盟官员的素质而言是可观的,但由于缺乏获得某些使用过的信息的机会,仍然为批评敞开了大门。在调查过程中。在欧盟引入某种程度上类似于美国现有的APO系统可能是向前迈出的一大步。但是,布鲁塞尔的一些实际障碍和普遍的政治不满使实行APO制度极为困难。但是,并不是所有的东西都丢失了。正如将在本简短贡献中介绍的那样,在欧盟一级,它已经存在一种要求在欧盟机构手中获取机密文件的手段:“真诚合作”学说。 “真诚合作” TEU是基于该学说的,其范围是由欧盟法院(CJEU)塑造的。它确实允许任何感兴趣的当事方通过欧盟国内司法管辖区,在欧盟与成员国之间存在的充分相互尊重的基础上,请求位于布鲁塞尔的机构提供协助,以获取欧盟机构手中的机密文件。 “真诚合作”学说不仅是理论上的,事实上,它已经在少数案例中由很少的贸易律师成功地进行了试验。也许,TDI透明化呼吁的有效答案已经在“欧盟之家”而不是在邻居的院子里。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号