首页> 外文期刊>Global Environmental Politics >Steering and Influence in Transnational Climate Governance: Nonstate Engagement in Solar Geoengineering Research
【24h】

Steering and Influence in Transnational Climate Governance: Nonstate Engagement in Solar Geoengineering Research

机译:跨国气候治理的转向与影响:太阳能地理工程研究中的非常规参与

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Theorists of transnational climate governance (TCG) seek to account for the increasing involvement of nonstate and substate actors in global climate policy. While transnational actors have been present in the emerging field of solar geoengineering-a novel technology intended to reflect a fraction of sunlight back to space to reduce climate impacts-many of their most significant activities, including knowledge dissemination, scientific capacity building, and conventional lobbying, are not captured by the TCG framework. Insofar as TCG is identified with transnational governance and transnational governance is important to reducing climate risks, an incomplete TCG framework is problematic for effective policy making. We attribute this shortcoming on the part of TCG to its exclusive focus on steering and corollary exclusion of influence as a critical component of governance. Exercising influence, for example, through inside and outside lobbying, is an important part of transnational governance-it complements direct governing with indirect efforts to inform, persuade, pressure, or otherwise influence both governor and governed. Based on an empirical analysis of solar geoengineering research governance and a theoretical consideration of alternative literatures, including research on interest groups and nonstate advocacy, we call for a broader theory of transnational governance that integrates steering and influence in a way that accounts for the full array of nonstate and substate engagements beyond the state.
机译:跨国气候治理(TCG)的理论旨在考虑不断增长的非国务和区别行动者在全球气候政策中的参与。虽然跨国演员已经存在于太阳能地理工程的新兴领域 - 一种新颖的技术,旨在反映一小部分阳光回到空间,以减少气候影响 - 许多最重要的活动,包括知识传播,科学能力建设和传统的游说,未被TCG框架捕获。由于TCG被跨国治理和跨国治理确定了降低气候风险的重要性,但不完整的TCG框架对于有效的政策制定是有问题的。我们将该缺点归因于TCG的独家专注于转向和推论影响力作为治理的关键组成部分。例如,通过内部和外面的游说行使影响,是跨国治理的重要组成部分 - 它的重点是直接努力,间接努力通知,说服,压力或以其他方式影响州长和管辖。基于太阳能地理工程研究治理的实证分析及替代文献的理论考虑,包括兴趣团体研究和非国务倡导,我们呼吁跨国治理理论,以占全阵的方式整合转向和影响非敌人和分类的历史之外。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Global Environmental Politics》 |2020年第3期|93-111|共19页
  • 作者单位

    Harvard Univ Keith Grp Geoengnneering Cambridge MA 02138 USA|Harvard Kennedy Sch Belfer Ctr Sci Technol & Publ Policy Program Cambridge MA 02138 USA;

    Univ Chicago Chicago IL 60637 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 01:21:09
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号