首页> 外文期刊>Global Environmental Politics >Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: The Case of the Cartagena Protocol and the World Trade Organization
【24h】

Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: The Case of the Cartagena Protocol and the World Trade Organization

机译:全球环境治理中的机构互动:《卡塔赫纳议定书》和世界贸易组织的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The competitive quest of the Cartagena Protocol and the WTO for authority to regulate international trade in genetically modified organisms (GMOs) exemplifies a typical interaction between international institutions with diverging objectives. This article first develops a conceptual framework for the analysis of institutional interaction that emphasizes disaggregation of complex interaction situations into separate cases of clearly directed inter-institutional influence. These cases can follow different causal mechanisms. Second, applying this framework to the interaction between the Cartagena Protocol and the WTO reveals that existing commitments have driven parties toward a step-wise delimitation of the institutions' jurisdictions. Although the WTO acquired a first-mover advantage by structuring the regulatory field, the Cartagena Protocol showed surprising strength in exploiting the remaining room for maneuver. The structure of international governance thus steers institutions with differing objectives toward a jurisdictional balance that, while reflecting existing power relations, limits the potential for conflict and frames available policy choices.
机译:对《卡塔赫纳议定书》和世贸组织的竞争性要求是对转基因生物国际贸易进行规范的权威,这说明了国际机构之间目标各异的典型相互作用。本文首先建立了一个用于分析机构互动的概念框架,该框架强调将复杂的互动情况分解为明确指示机构间影响的独立案例。这些情况可以遵循不同的因果机制。第二,将这一框架应用于《卡塔赫纳议定书》与世界贸易组织之间的互动,可以发现,现有的承诺已促使各方逐步界定机构的管辖权。尽管世贸组织通过构建监管领域而获得了先发优势,但《卡塔赫纳议定书》在利用剩余的回旋余地方面显示出惊人的实力。因此,国际治理的结构引导具有不同目标的机构实现司法管辖权平衡,尽管反映了现有的权力关系,但可以限制冲突的可能性并确定可用的政策选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号