首页> 外文期刊>Global Environmental Politics >Performing Symbolic Politics and International Environmental Regulation: Tracing and Theorizing a Causal Mechanism beyond Regime Theory
【24h】

Performing Symbolic Politics and International Environmental Regulation: Tracing and Theorizing a Causal Mechanism beyond Regime Theory

机译:履行象征性政治与国际环境法规:超越政体理论的因果机制追踪与理论化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article demonstrates the empirical relevance and elaborates the theoretical foundation of a "polity-centered" causal mechanism of international environmental regulation which has been only superficially touched upon in international environmental regime theory and which challenges the policy-centrism of this field of research. Motorboat regulations on Lake Constance demonstrate the limits of established approaches in regime theory in explaining the strict regulations of this early regime. Rationalist explanatory approaches are not convincing since there are no helpful structural constellations and no functional need. According to normative-cognitive approaches, the institutional density and differentiation that exists in the transboundary Lake Constance region makes an "advocacy coalition" approach better suited than an "epistemic community" approach. Yet, even this perspective cannot explain the international breakthroughs towards strong regulations. To fill the remaining gap, it is necessary to account for the symbolic value of water in representing emerging transnational identities and institutions. Polity-centered coalitions of political leaders around the lake "performed" innovative regulations in a highly symbolic policy field in order to gain attention and recognition for their institutionaliza-tion of the idea of a "Euregio Bodensee." The article ends by demonstrating the empirical relevance of this causal mechanism beyond Lake Constance and dis-cusses the theoretical consequences in the field of transnational water governance.
机译:本文展示了经验相关性,并阐述了国际环境规制的“以政治为中心”的因果机制的理论基础,这种机制只是在国际环境制度理论中才被浅谈,并向该研究领域的政策中心主义提出了挑战。康斯坦茨湖上的摩托艇法规在解释这种早期制度的严格规定时证明了制度理论中已建立方法的局限性。理性主义的解释方法没有说服力,因为没有有用的结构群,也没有功能上的需要。根据规范认知方法,跨界康斯坦茨湖地区存在的制度密度和分化使“倡导联盟”方法比“流行病社区”方法更适合。但是,即使从这种观点来看,也无法解释国际上对强有力法规的突破。为了填补剩余的空白,有必要考虑水在代表新兴的跨国身份和机构中的象征价值。围绕政治中心的以湖人为中心的政治联盟在高度象征性的政策领域“执行”了创新法规,以引起人们的关注和认可,因为他们将“ Euregio Bodensee”的想法制度化。文章最后通过论证了康斯坦茨湖以外这种因果机制的经验相关性,并讨论了跨国水治理领域的理论后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号