首页> 外文期刊>Global and planetary change >Reply to the comment of J. Gumbel and H. Rodhe on 'Thermal pollution causes global warming', by B. Nordell [Global Planet. Change 38 (2003), 305-312]
【24h】

Reply to the comment of J. Gumbel and H. Rodhe on 'Thermal pollution causes global warming', by B. Nordell [Global Planet. Change 38 (2003), 305-312]

机译:回复J. Gumbel和H. Rodhe对B. Nordell提出的“热污染导致全球变暖”的评论。 Change 38(2003),305-312]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To understand complex problems like the energy balance of Earth, we should not look at the details without having a more large-scale understanding of the problem. My approach (Nordell, 2003) is therefore axiomatic. Over longer time scales (years), the Earth is a net heat source in space to which it emits its heat. Consequently, the periodic heating and cooling that occur during much shorter time scales are of no interest for this long-term energy balance. These periodic energy flows are zero sum events that add no heat to the planet, which also answers most of the comments made by Gumbel and Rodhe (G&R). One example, which G&R say that the author "does not seem to appreciate, is that the radiative fluxes at the surface, at any given location and time, do not necessarily balance out". The author understands this, but in my much longer time scale, they do balance out.
机译:要了解诸如地球的能量平衡之类的复杂问题,在没有对问题有更大规模的了解之前,我们不应该查看细节。因此,我的方法(Nordell,2003年)是不言而喻的。在更长的时间范围(年)内,地球是空间中向其散发热量的净热源。因此,对于这种长期的能量平衡而言,在短得多的时间范围内发生的周期性加热和冷却是没有意义的。这些周期性的能量流是零和事件,不会给地球增加热量,这也回答了Gumbel和Rodhe(G&R)的大部分评论。 G&R说作者“似乎不欣赏”的一个例子是,在任何给定的位置和时间,表面的辐射通量不一定会平衡”。作者理解这一点,但是在我更长的时间范围内,它们确实可以平衡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号