...
首页> 外文期刊>Global and planetary change >Dangers of using global bioclimatic datasets for ecological niche modeling. Limitations for future climate projections
【24h】

Dangers of using global bioclimatic datasets for ecological niche modeling. Limitations for future climate projections

机译:使用全球生物气候数据集进行生态位建模的危险。未来气候预测的局限性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Global bioclimatic datasets are being widely used in ecological research to estimate the potential distribution of species using Climate Envelope Models (CEMs). These datasets are easily available and offer high resolution information for all land areas globally. However, they have not been tested rigorously in smaller regions, and their use in regional CEM studies may pose problems derived from their poor representation of local climate features. Moreover, these problems may be enhanced when using CEMs for future climate projections-a topic of current active research—due to the uncertainty derived from the future altered climate scenarios. In this paper we use distributional data of European beech (Fagus sylvatica) in Northern Iberian Peninsula to analyze the discrepancies of the CEMs (predictive skill, variable importance and consistency using different predictor subsets) resulting from three alternative public, high-resolution climate datasets: a benchmarking regional climate dataset developed for the area of study (UC), the University of Barcelona Atlas for the Iberian Peninsula (UAB) and the worldwide WorldClim bioclimatic dataset (WC). The same CEM techniques (multiple logistic regression and multivariate adaptive regression splines) were applied to the different datasets, showing that the quality of the baseline climate has a great impact on the resulting models, as manifested by the different contributions of the bioclimatic predictors to the resulting models. Artifactual bioclimatic variables were found in some datasets, representing topographical features and spatial gradients, rather than true climatic patterns, thus significantly contributing to the models, although not for the right reasons. This causes a misleading model interpretation and problems for extrapolation in future climate conditions, as evidenced analyzing the future projections obtained using state-of-the-art regional climate projections from the ENSEMBLES project.
机译:全球生物气候数据集已被广泛用于生态研究中,以使用气候信封模型(CEM)估算物种的潜在分布。这些数据集易于获得,并为全球所有陆地区域提供高分辨率信息。但是,尚未在较小的区域中对它们进行严格的测试,它们在区域CEM研究中的使用可能会由于其对局部气候特征的代表性不足而引起问题。此外,由于未来气候变化情景带来的不确定性,将CEM用于未来的气候预测时,这些问题可能会加剧。在本文中,我们使用伊比利亚北部半岛欧洲山毛榉(Fagus sylvatica)的分布数据来分析由三个替代的公共,高分辨率气候数据集导致的CEM差异(预测技能,变量重要性和使用不同预测变量子集的一致性):为研究领域(UC),巴塞罗那阿特拉斯大学伊比利亚半岛(UAB)和全球WorldClim生物气候数据集(WC)开发的基准区域气候数据集。相同的CEM技术(多元logistic回归和多元自适应回归样条曲线)应用于不同的数据集,表明基线气候的质量对所得模型有很大影响,这体现在生物气候预测因子对气候变化的不同贡献上。结果模型。在某些数据集中发现了人工生物气候变量,这些变量代表了地形特征和空间梯度,而不是真实的气候模式,因此尽管没有正确的理由,但对模型的贡献很大。这证明了对模型的误解,并提出了未来气候条件下的外推问题,这是对使用ENSEMBLES项目的最新区域气候预测所获得的未来预测进行分析所得到的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号