首页> 外文期刊>Geotechnical testing journal >Evaluation of Soil-Geogrid Pullout Models Using a Statistical Approach
【24h】

Evaluation of Soil-Geogrid Pullout Models Using a Statistical Approach

机译:用统计方法评估土壤-Geogrid拔出模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The accuracy of the current Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) in-soil geogrid pullout model was examined using a statistical approach applied to a large database of pullout test results. The accuracy of data interpretation and model type was quantified using the mean and coefficient of variation (COV) of model bias values and possible hidden dependencies identified using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Model bias values were computed as the ratio of measured to predicted pullout capacity. When project-specific pullout test data were used to fit a linear approximation to dimensionless interaction coefficients, the result was judged to be an acceptably accurate model (mean bias value of one and a small spread in bias values, i.e., COV=0.13). However, in many cases project-specific pullout data are not available. If the current FHWA model with default values is used, the prediction accuracy is very poor based on the same quantitative measures (mean of bias=2.23 and COV=0.55). Two new models were examined to overcome this deficiency. One model is bi-linear and the other is non-linear. The non-linear model was shown to be more accurate with a mean bias value close to one and COV=0.36. The non-linear model also has the advantage of being smoothly continuous with practically no detectable hidden dependencies. Finally, the large number of test results in the database allows recommendations to be made on how to select reinforcement lengths during the experimental design to increase the likelihood of a pullout mode of failure in the laboratory.
机译:使用统计方法将当前联邦公路管理局(FHWA)的土壤土工格栅拉拔模型的准确性进行了检验,该统计方法适用于拉拔测试结果的大型数据库。数据解释和模型类型的准确性使用模型偏差值的均值和变异系数(COV)以及使用Spearman秩相关系数确定的可能隐藏的依赖关系进行量化。将模型偏差值计算为测量值与预测拔出能力的比率。当使用特定项目的拉出测试数据将线性近似拟合为无量纲的相互作用系数时,该结果被认为是可以接受的准确模型(平均偏差值为1且偏差值分布很小,即COV = 0.13)。但是,在许多情况下,没有特定于项目的提取数据。如果使用具有默认值的当前FHWA模型,则基于相同的定量度量(偏差均值= 2.23,COV = 0.55),预测准确性非常差。为了克服这一缺陷,研究了两种新模型。一个模型是双线性的,另一个模型是非线性的。非线性模型显示更准确,平均偏差值接近1,COV = 0.36。非线性模型还具有平滑连续的优势,几乎没有可检测到的隐藏依赖性。最后,数据库中的大量测试结果允许对在实验设计过程中如何选择加固长度提出建议,以增加在实验室中拉出失效模式的可能性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Geotechnical testing journal》 |2009年第6期|489-504|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Dept. of Civil Engineering, GeoEngineering Centre at Queen's-RMC, Queen's Univ., Kingston. ON K7L 3N6. Canada;

    Dept. of Civil Engineering, GeoEngineering Centre at Queen's-RMC, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, ON K7K 7B4, Canada;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    geosynthetics; pullout testing; analysis;

    机译:土工合成材料拔出测试;分析;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号