首页> 外文期刊>Geotechnical and geological engineering >Comparison of Measured and PTF Predictions of SWCCs for Loess Soils in China
【24h】

Comparison of Measured and PTF Predictions of SWCCs for Loess Soils in China

机译:中国黄土SWCCs实测值与PTF预测值的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There are significant advantages in using indirect pedo-transfer functions, (PTFs) for the estimation of unsaturated soil properties. The pedo-transfer functions can be used for the estimation of the soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC) which in turn is used for the estimation of other unsaturated soil properties. The accuracy of the indirect pedo-transfer function method for the estimation of the SWCC depends on the PTF and the equation used to best-fit the particle-size distribution (PSD) data. The objectives of this study are to: (1) evaluate the performance of the Fredlund et al. (Can Geotech J 37:817-827, 2000) equation for best-fitting the particle-size distribution, (PSD) data, and, (2) compare the predictions made by two of the commonly used PTFs; namely, Arya and Paris (Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:1023-1030, 1981) and Fredlund et al. (Can Geotech J 39:1103-1117, 2002), for estimating the SWCC from the PSD. The authors used 258rnmeasured PSDs and SWCC datasets from the Loess Plateau, China, for this study. The dataset consisted of 187 silt-loam soils, 41 loam soils, 11 silt-clay-loam soils, 10 sand-loam soils, 6 silt-clay soils, and 3 loam-sand soils. The SWCC and PSD datasets were measured using a Pressure Plate apparatus and the pipette method, respectively. The comparison between the estimated and measured particle-size distribution curves showed that the Fredlund et al. (Can Geotech J 37:817-827, 2000) equation closely prepresented the PSD for all soils in the Loess Plateau, with a lower root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.869%. The comparison between the estimated and measured water contents at the same suction showed that the Fredlund et al. (Can Geotech J 39:1103-1117, 2002) PTF performed somewhat better than the Arya and Paris (Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:1023-1030, 1981) function. The Fredlund et al. method had RMSE value of 0.039 cm~3 cm~(-3) as opposed to 0.046 cm~3 cm~(-3) for the Arya and Paris (Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:1023-1030, 1981) method. The Fredlund et al. (Can Geotech J 39:1103-1117, 2002) PTF produced the closest predictions for sand-loam, loam-sand, and loam soils, with a lower RMSE for gravimetric water content ranging from 0.006 to 0.036 cm~3 cm~(-3). There were consistent over-estimations observed for silt-loam, silt-clay-loam, and slit-clay soils with RMSE values for gravimetric water content ranging from 0.037 to 0.043 cm~3 cm~(-3). The measured and estimated air-entry values were closest when using the Fredlund et al. (Can Geotech J 39:1103-1117, 2002) PTF. The measured and estimated maximum slopes on the SWCC were closest when using the Arya and Paris (Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:1023-1030, 1981) PTF.
机译:使用间接的pedo传递函数(PTF)估算非饱和土壤特性具有显着优势。踏板传递函数可用于估算土壤-水特征曲线(SWCC),而该曲线又可用于估算其他非饱和土壤特性。间接脚步传递函数方法用于估算SWCC的准确性取决于PTF和用于最佳拟合粒度分布(PSD)数据的方程式。这项研究的目的是:(1)评价Fredlund等人的性能。 (Can Geotech J 37:817-827,2000)最适合拟合粒度分布(PSD)数据的方程,(2)比较两个常用PTF的预测;即Arya和Paris(Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:1023-1030,1981)和Fredlund等。 (Can Geotech J 39:1103-1117,2002),用于根据PSD估算SWCC。作者使用了来自中国黄土高原的258个测得的PSD和SWCC数据集进行了这项研究。该数据集包括187个粉壤土,41个壤土,11个粉土粘土土,10个砂壤土,6个粉土土壤和3个壤土。分别使用压板设备和移液器方法测量SWCC和PSD数据集。估计的和测量的粒度分布曲线之间的比较表明,Fredlund等人。 (Can Geotech J 37:817-827,2000)方程紧密地代表了黄土高原所有土壤的PSD,其均方根误差(RMSE)较低,为0.869%。在相同的吸力下,估计的含水量和测量的含水量之间的比较表明,Fredlund等人。 (Can Geotech J 39:1103-1117,2002)PTF的性能要比Arya和Paris(Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:1023-1030,1981)更好。 Fredlund等。该方法的RMSE值为0.039 cm〜3 cm〜(-3),而Arya和Paris方法则为0.046 cm〜3 cm〜(-3)(Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:1023-1030,1981)。 Fredlund等。 (Can Geotech J 39:1103-1117,2002)PTF对砂壤土,壤土和壤土产生了最接近的预测,重量水含量从0.006到0.036 cm〜3 cm〜(- 3)。相对于RMSE值,含水量为0.037至0.043 cm〜3 cm〜(-3)的粉壤土,粉质黏土壤土和狭缝黏土存在一致的高估现象。当使用Fredlund等人的方法时,测得的和估计的进气值最接近。 (Can Geotech J 39:1103-1117,2002)PTF。当使用Arya和Paris(Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:1023-1030,1981)PTF时,SWCC上测得和估计的最大斜率最接近。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号