首页> 外文期刊>Geotechnical and geological engineering >Investigation on the Characteristics of Pore Water Flow During CRS Consolidation Test
【24h】

Investigation on the Characteristics of Pore Water Flow During CRS Consolidation Test

机译:CRS固结试验中孔隙水流特征的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Several experimental methods have been proposed for consolidation test such as: constant loading rate, constant gradient and constant rate of strain (CRS). Unfortunately, there are no unique criteria for performing the CRS consolidation test. Also, there are considerable differences among the standards proposed for the test. In the present paper, authors have tried to find the reasons for differences among standards, by studying the basic assumptions made on the characteristics of the pore water flow during consolidation process. In the course of study, CRS consolidation tests were carried out under different strain rates on remolded samples. The results of the tests have indicated that the Darcy's law is not valid throughout the CRS test and therefore, any consolidation equation based on Darcy's law would not provide accurate results. The results of the current experiments also showed that with regard to the applied strain rates, there are three different flow regimes governing the process named as: pre-linear (non-Darcy flow), linear (Darcy flow) and post-linear (non-Darcy flow). Experimental results also showed that distinction between boundaries of linear and nonlinear flow is possible from the excess pore pressure developed during the tests.
机译:已经提出了几种用于固结测试的实验方法,例如:恒定加载速率,恒定梯度和恒定应变率(CRS)。不幸的是,执行CRS合并测试没有唯一的标准。此外,为测试建议的标准之间也存在相当大的差异。在本文中,作者试图通过研究固结过程中孔隙水流动特征的基本假设来找出标准之间差异的原因。在研究过程中,对重塑样品在不同应变速率下进行了CRS固结测试。测试结果表明,达西定律在整个CRS测试中均无效,因此,任何基于达西定律的合并方程都无法提供准确的结果。当前实验的结果还表明,就所施加的应变速率而言,控制该过程的三种不同流态分别为:线性前(非达西流),线性(达西流)和线性后(非流)。 -达西流)。实验结果还表明,根据测试过程中产生的过大孔隙压力,可以区分线性流和非线性流的边界。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号