首页> 外文期刊>Geophysics: the leading edge of exploration >A column by Lee Lawyer with stories about geophysics and geophysicists
【24h】

A column by Lee Lawyer with stories about geophysics and geophysicists

机译:Lee Lawyer的专栏,讲述有关地球物理学和地球物理学家的故事

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I am on the trail of Associate Members who haven't upgraded to Active. Perhaps many are geologists who don't think they are qualified. Can you pick a seismic record, considering statics and NMO? Can you graphically migrate picked data? If so, you are qualified for Active membership. Just kidding! These days you can't find a seismic record that still has NMO and statics. I recently heard a prominent AAPG member suggest that the difference between the two societies was that geophysicists are interested in field operations and instrumentation, which is of no interest to geologists. I agree that geologists are probably not too interested in instrumentation and field operations, but I was amazed that this person didn't realize that geophysics has progressed a little since the 1930s. SEG members represent a wide variety of backgrounds and interests. It seems ridiculous to have to start enumerating them. So I won't. But I am off the subject.
机译:我正在寻找尚未升级为活跃会员的准会员。也许许多地质学家认为自己没有资格。您可以考虑静力学和NMO来选择地震记录吗?您能以图形方式迁移选择的数据吗?如果是这样,则您有资格获得Active会员资格。开玩笑!如今,您找不到具有NMO和静态数据的地震记录。我最近听到AAPG的一位重要成员提出,这两个社会之间的区别是地球物理学家对现场操作和仪器感兴趣,而地质学家则对此不感兴趣。我同意地质学家可能对仪器和现场操作不太感兴趣,但是令我惊讶的是,这个人没有意识到地球物理学自1930年代以来取得了一些进步。 SEG成员代表着各种各样的背景和兴趣。必须枚举它们似乎很荒谬。所以我不会。但是我没有这个话题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号