...
首页> 外文期刊>Geophysical Prospecting >Influence of pore pressure on velocity in low-porosity sandstone: Implications for time-lapse feasibility and pore-pressure study
【24h】

Influence of pore pressure on velocity in low-porosity sandstone: Implications for time-lapse feasibility and pore-pressure study

机译:孔隙压力对低孔隙度砂岩速度的影响:对时延可行性和孔隙压力研究的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As seismic data quality improves, time-lapse seismic data is increasingly being called upon to interpret and predict changes during reservoir development and production. Since pressure change is a major component of reservoir change during production, a thorough understanding of the influence of pore pressure on seismic velocity is critical. Laboratory measurements show that differential pressure (overburden minus fluid pressure) does not adequately determine the actual reservoir conditions. Changes in fluid pressure are found to have an additional effect on the physical properties of rocks. The effective-stress coefficient n is used to quantify the effect of pore pressure compared to confining pressure on rock properties. However, the current practice in time-lapse feasibility studies, reservoir-pressure inversion and pore-pressure prediction is to assume that n = 1. Laboratory measurements, reported in both this and previous research show that n can be significantly less than unity for low-porosity rocks and that it varies with porosity, rock texture and wave type. We report the results of ultrasonic experiments to estimate n for low-porosity sandstones with and without microcracks. Our results show that, for P-waves, n is as low as 0.4 at a differential pressure of 20 MPa (about 3000 psi) for a low-porosity sandstone. Thus, in pore-pressure inversion, an assumption of n = 1 would lead to a 150% underestimation of the pore pressure. Comparison of the effective-stress coefficient for fractured and unfractured samples suggests that the presence of microfrac-tures increases the sensitivity of P-wave velocity to pore pressure, and therefore the effective-stress coefficient. Our results show that the effective-stress coefficient decreases with the differential pressure, with a higher differential pressure resulting in a lower effective-stress coefficient. While the effective-stress coefficient for P-wave velocity can be significantly less than unity, it is close to one for S-waves.
机译:随着地震数据质量的提高,越来越多地需要延时地震数据来解释和预测储层开发和生产过程中的变化。由于压力变化是生产过程中储层变化的主要组成部分,因此全面了解孔隙压力对地震速度的影响至关重要。实验室测量表明,压差(上覆层减去流体压力)不能充分确定实际储层条件。发现流体压力的变化对岩石的物理性质具有附加影响。有效应力系数n用于量化孔隙压力与围压相比对岩石特性的影响。但是,目前在延时可行性研究,油藏反演和孔隙压力预测中的实践是假设n =1。在本次研究和先前研究中报告的实验室测量结果表明,低时n可能显着小于1。孔隙度的岩石,并随孔隙度,岩石质地和波浪类型而变化。我们报告了超声实验的结果,以估计有或没有微裂纹的低孔隙度砂岩的n值。我们的结果表明,对于P波,对于低孔隙度砂岩,在20 MPa(约3000 psi)的压差下,n低至0.4。因此,在孔隙压力反演中,假设n = 1将导致孔隙压力低估150%。比较破裂和未破裂样品的有效应力系数表明,微裂缝的存在增加了纵波速度对孔隙压力的敏感性,从而提高了有效应力系数。我们的结果表明,有效应力系数随压差而减小,而较高的压差导致较低的有效应力系数。虽然P波速度的有效应力系数可能大大小于1,但对于S波却接近1。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号