...
首页> 外文期刊>Geomorphology >Effects of DEM resolutions on soil erosion prediction using Chinese Soil Loss Equation
【24h】

Effects of DEM resolutions on soil erosion prediction using Chinese Soil Loss Equation

机译:DEM决议对利用中国土壤损失方程土壤侵蚀预测的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Slope length and slope steepness are the two topographic factors (L and S) used in the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) for soil erosion prediction. These factors are usually extracted from the digital elevation models (DEM). We hypothesized that different DEM resolutions and sources influence extracted topographic factors and therefore soil loss estimation. The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of different DEM resolutions on the topographic factor calculation and consequently soil loss prediction on different geomorphological types in China and United States. We selected three typical landforms of plains, hills and mountains in both countries. We used 1) open source DEMs of 3-, 10-, 30-, and 90-m in the United States, and 2) DEMs generated with 1:10,000 and 1:50,000 topographic maps in China to extract topographic factors using a LS software tool. The Chinese Soil Loss Equation (CSLE) was used to calculate average annual soil loss. The results showed that different DEM resolutions had different effects on the extracted L and S factors. Slope length and the L factor were overestimated as DEM resolutions coarsened, and the trend of the overestimation in different landforms was the same. Slope steepness and the S factor were underestimated as DEM resolution decreased in all landforms. However, the LS factor as a product of L and S factors, which reflects relative soil loss if the other factors are held constant, are less sensitive to DEM resolutions than either L or S factor alone due to partial error cancelation. Thus, the LS factor is not as greatly affected by DEM resolutions as either L or S factor alone. The relative soil loss errors are similar for all DEMs, and & ldquo;good results for wrong reasons & rdquo; are obtained with coarser DEMs. Overall results indicate that except for the 90 m DEM for certain occasion, all DEMs may be used to estimate soil loss for all types of terrains for practical application, as far as the relative soil loss errors are concerned. However, in the range of 3 & ndash;90 m resolutions, for the sake of good practice and solid scientific support, higher resolution DEMs if available ought to be used to minimize estimation errors of L and S factors and consequently to increase confidence of soil loss prediction.(c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:斜坡长度和坡度陡度是用于土壤侵蚀预测的通用土壤损失方程(USLE)中使用的两个地形因子(L和S)。这些因素通常从数字高程模型(DEM)中提取。我们假设不同的DEM分辨率和来源影响提取的地形因素,从而影响土壤损失估计。本研究的目的是量化不同DEM分辨率对地形因子计算的影响,从而对中国和美国不同地貌类型的土壤损失预测。我们在两国选择了三个平原,山丘和山脉的典型地貌。我们使用了1)在美国的3分,10-,30 - 和90-m的开源DEM,2)DEM,以1:10,000和1:50,000地图地图产生,以提取使用LS的地形因素软件工具。中国土壤损失方程(CSLE)用于计算平均年土壤损失。结果表明,不同的DEM分辨率对提取的L和S因子产生了不同的影响。斜坡长度和L因子被归因于DEM分辨率粗糙,不同地貌中的高估趋势是相同的。坡度陡峭和S因子被低估,因为所有地貌中的DEM分辨率下降。然而,LS因子作为L和S因子的产物,如果其他因素保持恒定,则反映了相对的土壤损失,对DEM分辨率不太敏感,而不是仅由于部分误差取消而单独的因素。因此,LS因子不受DEM分辨率作为L或S因子的大大影响。所有DEM的相对土壤损失误差都是类似的,而且LDQUO;出于错误的原因&rdquo的良好结果;用粗糙的dems获得。总体结果表明,除了某些机会的90米DEM外,所有DEM可用于估算所有类型地形的土壤损失,只要相对的土壤损失误差涉及相对的土壤损失。但是,在3&Ndash的范围内;决议的良好实践和坚实的科学支持,如果可用的是,如果可用于最小化L和S因素的估计误差,则更高的分辨率DEM,因此增加了土壤的信心损失预测。(c)2021 Elsevier BV保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号