...
首页> 外文期刊>Geomorphology >State of the art of national landslide databases in Europe and their potential for assessing landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk
【24h】

State of the art of national landslide databases in Europe and their potential for assessing landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk

机译:欧洲国家滑坡数据库的最新技术及其在评估滑坡敏感性,危害和风险方面的潜力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A landslide inventory is the most important information source for quantitative zoning of landslide suscep tibility, hazard and risk. It should give insight into the location, date, type, size, activity and causal factors of landslides as well as resultant damage. In Europe, many countries have created or are creating national and/or regional landslide databases (LDBs). Yet little is known on their contents, completeness, format, struc ture, language use and accessibility, and hence on their ability to perform national or transnational landslide zoning. Therefore, this study presents a detailed analysis of existing national LDBs in the EU member states, EU official candidate and potential candidate countries, and EFTA countries, and their possible use for land slide zoning. These national LDBs were compared with a subset of 22 regional databases. Twenty-two out of 37 contacted European countries currently have national LDBs, and six other countries have only regional LDBs. In total, the national LDBs contain 633,696 landslides, of which 485,004 are located in Italy, while Aus tria, the Czech Republic, France, Norway, Poland, Slovakia, and the UK also have > 10,000 landslides in their LDBs. National LDBs are generally created in the official language of each country and 58% of them contain other natural hazards (e.g. floods and sinkholes). About 68% of the LDBs contain less than 50% of all landslides in each country, but a positive observation is that 60% of the LDBs are updated at least once a year or after a major event. Most landslide locations are collected with traditional methods such as field surveys, aerial photo interpretation and analysis of historical records. Currently, integration of landslide information from different national LDBs is hampered because of differences in language and classification systems for land slide type and activity. Other problems are that currently only half of the national LDBs have a direct link be tween spatial and alphanumeric information, and that public access is generally restricted or limited. A minimum set of features to be included in national LDBs is suggested, and a flow chart is presented that clas sifies European countries by ability to perform national-scale landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk analyses.
机译:滑坡清单是对滑坡易感性,危害和风险进行定量分区的最重要的信息来源。它应深入了解滑坡的位置,日期,类型,大小,活动和成因,以及造成的破坏。在欧洲,许多国家已经建立或正在建立国家和/或区域滑坡数据库(LDB)。然而,关于它们的内容,完整性,格式,结构,语言使用和可访问性,以及因此它们进行国家或跨国滑坡分区的能力知之甚少。因此,本研究详细分析了欧盟成员国,欧盟官方候选国和潜在候选国以及欧洲自由贸易区国家中的现有国家最不发达国家,以及它们在滑坡分区中的可能用途。将这些国家最不发达国家与22个区域数据库的子集进行了比较。在与欧洲接触的37个国家中,有22个目前拥有国家最不发达国家,其他六个国家仅拥有地区性最不发达国家。全国最不发达国家总共有633,696个滑坡,其中485,004个位于意大利,而澳大利亚,捷克,法国,挪威,波兰,斯洛伐克和英国的最不发达国家也有10,000多个滑坡。国家最不发达国家通常以每个国家的官方语言创建,其中58%包含其他自然灾害(例如洪水和下水道)。在每个国家中,大约68%的最不发达国家所占滑坡总量不到50%,但积极的观察结果是60%的最不发达国家至少每年或在重大事件发生后进行更新。大多数滑坡位置是通过传统方法收集的,例如野外调查,航拍照片解释和历史记录分析。目前,由于针对滑坡类型和活动的语言和分类系统的差异,阻碍了来自不同国家最不发达国家的滑坡信息整合。其他问题是,目前只有一半的国家最不发达国家在空间信息和字母数字信息之间具有直接联系,并且公众访问通常受到限制或限制。建议在国家最不发达国家中包括最少的功能,并给出流程图,通过执行国家级滑坡敏感性,危害和风险分析的能力来分类欧洲国家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号