首页> 外文期刊>Geomorphology >Frequency-magnitude distribution of debris flows compiled from global data, and comparison with post-fire debris flows in the western U.S.
【24h】

Frequency-magnitude distribution of debris flows compiled from global data, and comparison with post-fire debris flows in the western U.S.

机译:根据全球数据汇编的泥石流的频率-幅度分布,并与美国西部的火灾后泥石流进行比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Forecasting debris flow hazard is challenging due to the episodic occurrence of debris flows in response to stochastic precipitation and, in some areas, wildfires. In order to facilitate hazard assessment, we have gathered available records of debris flow volumes into the first comprehensive global catalog of debris flows (n = 988). We also present results of field collection of recent debris flows (n = 77) in the northern Rocky Mountains, where debris flow frequency increases following wildfire. As a first step in parameterizing hazard models, we use frequency-magnitude distributions and empirical cumulative distribution functions (ECDFs) to compare volumes of post-fire debris flows to non-fire-related debris flows. The ECDF of post-fire debris flow volumes is significantly different (at 95% confidence) from that of non-fire-related debris flows, suggesting that the post-fire distribution is composed of a higher proportion of small events than that of non-fire-related debris flows. The slope of the frequency-magnitude distribution of post-fire debris flows is steeper than that of non-fire-related debris flows, corroborating evidence that small post-fire debris flows occur with a higher relative frequency than non-fire-related debris flows. Taken together, the statistical analyses suggest that post-fire debris flows come from a different population than non-fire-related debris flows, and their hazard must be modeled separately. We propose two possible non-exclusive explanations for the fact that the post-fire environment produces a higher proportion of small debris flows: 1) following fires, smaller storms or effective drainage areas can trigger debris flows due to increased runoff and/or decreases in root strength, resulting in smaller volumes and increased probability of failure, and 2) fire increases the probability and frequency of debris flows, causing their distribution to shift toward smaller events due to limitations in sediment supply.
机译:由于泥石流是随机降雨和某些地区的野火引起的偶发性事件,因此预测泥石流危险具有挑战性。为了促进危害评估,我们将可用的泥石流记录收集到了第一个综合性泥石流全球目录中(n = 988)。我们还介绍了落基山脉北部地区最近的泥石流(n = 77)的野外采集结果,在山火之后泥石流频率增加。作为参数化危害模型的第一步,我们使用频率幅度分布和经验累积分布函数(ECDF)将火灾后的泥石流量与非火灾相关的泥石流量进行比较。火灾后泥石流的ECDF与非火灾相关泥石流的ECDF显着不同(置信度为95%),这表明火灾后分布的小事件所占比例比非火灾高。与火灾有关的泥石流。火灾后泥石流的频率-幅度分布的斜率比非火灾相关泥石流的斜率陡,这证明了小型火灾后碎片流的发生频率比非火灾相关泥石流更高。 。两者合计,统计分析表明,火灾后的泥石流与非火灾相关的泥石流来自不同的人群,其危害必须单独建模。对于火灾后的环境产生较大比例的小碎片流的事实,我们提出两种可能的非排他性解释:1)火灾后,较小的风暴或有效的排水区域可能会由于径流增加和/或径流减小而触发碎片流。根部强度,导致较小的体积和增加的破坏可能性,以及2)火灾增加了泥石流的可能性和发生频率,由于沉积物供应的限制,导致泥石流的分布向较小的事件转移。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Geomorphology》 |2013年第1期|118-128|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Geosciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA;

    Department of Geosciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA;

    College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA;

    Department of Geology, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA 95192, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Debris flow; Frequency; Magnitude; Fire;

    机译:泥石流;频率;大小;火;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号