...
首页> 外文期刊>GeoJournal >The local politics of the global countryside: boosterism, aspirational ruralism and the contested reconstitution of Queenstown, New Zealand
【24h】

The local politics of the global countryside: boosterism, aspirational ruralism and the contested reconstitution of Queenstown, New Zealand

机译:全球农村的地方政治:鼓吹主义,理想的农村主义和新西兰皇后镇的有争议的重组

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper examines the local politics through which the reconstitution of rural localities under globalization is advanced and contested, with particular reference to the impact of international amenity migration. It contends that as globalization proceeds not by domination but by hybridization and negotiation, local politics is critical as the sphere in which the outcomes of globalization processes are interpreted and contested. The paper examines the case study of Queenstown Lakes district in South Island, New Zealand, as a locality that has experienced significant transformation through engagement with globalization processes. These include high levels of international amenity in-migration, substantial overseas investment in property, commerce and construction projects, and an increasing volume of international tourists. Collectively, these processes have contributed to rapid population growth and intensive pressure for the development of rural land in the area. As detailed in the paper, land use planning became the dominant issue in local politics, with conflict between groups informed by ‘boosterist’ and ‘environmentalist’ stand-points, as well as the ‘aspirational ruralism’ of amenity in-migrants. Although locally-grounded, the conflict engaged trans-local actors and networks and transgressed space and scale, thus becoming itself an expression of globalization.
机译:本文考察了推动和挑战全球化下的农村地区重组的地方政治,特别是针对国际便利性移民的影响。它认为,随着全球化不是通过统治而是通过混合和谈判而进行,地方政治作为解释和争辩全球化过程的结果的领域至关重要。本文考察了新西兰南岛皇后镇湖区的案例研究,该地区通过参与全球化进程而经历了重大变革。这些包括高水平的国际便利设施移民,对房地产,商业和建筑项目的大量海外投资以及不断增长的国际游客数量。这些过程共同促进了人口的快速增长,并为该地区农村土地的发展带来了巨大的压力。正如该论文所详述的那样,土地使用规划已成为地方政治中的主要问题,各群体之间的冲突以“推动者”和“环境主义者”的立场为依据,以及便利移民的“理想乡村主义”。冲突虽然是局部性的,但仍涉及跨地方的行为者和网络,侵犯了空间和规模,因此本身就是全球化的一种表达。

著录项

  • 来源
    《GeoJournal》 |2011年第4期|p.365-381|共17页
  • 作者

    Michael Woods;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号