...
首页> 外文期刊>Geographical Research >Cultural Economy: Achievements, Divergences, Future Prospects
【24h】

Cultural Economy: Achievements, Divergences, Future Prospects

机译:文化经济:成就,分歧,未来前景

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper reflects on two decades' scholarship in geography on cultural economy, assessing strides made against some of the expectations of early proponents. Cultural economy continues to be a polysemic term. In some quarters, it refers to a type of economic geography into which matters of 'culture' are absorbed. This work frequently focuses on the empirics of the so-called 'cultural and creative industries'. Others see cultural economic research as an opportunity to move beyond the epistemological constraints of 'culture' and 'economy', questioning their status as foundational categories. This latter approach has been used in a broader set of empirical projects encompassing technology, knowledge, and society. Contrasting threads of cultural economic research have helpfully moved geographical scholarship beyond paradigmatic limitations, but jostle somewhat uncomfortably within existing (and increasingly specialised) disciplinary and subdisciplinary fields. The risk is that by questioning the categorical underpinnings of much specialised research, cultural economy struggles to 'belong' in the increasingly coded and compartmentalised university setting. I conclude with a discussion of future prospects. Some measure of vitality could be achieved through incorporation of a cultural economy perspective into the pressing issues of climate change, human sustenance, and urban infrastructure planning. These are issues for which the polysemy of cultural economy could prove constructive, transcending technocentric market 'fixes' and bland assumptions about how best to 'green' our cities - promoting instead ethnographic interrogations of how humans access, use, exchange, and value financial and material resources as moral and social beings.
机译:本文回顾了二十年来文化经济地理学的研究成果,评估了在早期支持者的某些期望下取得的进步。文化经济仍然是一个多义词。在某些方面,它指的是一种吸收了“文化”问题的经济地理类型。这项工作经常侧重于所谓的“文化和创意产业”的经验。其他人则认为文化经济研究是超越“文化”和“经济”的认识论限制的机会,对它们作为基础类别的地位提出了质疑。后一种方法已用于包括技术,知识和社会在内的更广泛的经验项目中。文化经济学研究的不同线索有助于将地理学学术超越范式的局限,但在现有的(以及越来越专业化的)学科和副学科领域有些争执。风险在于,通过质疑许多专门研究的分类依据,文化经济在日益加深编码和分隔的大学环境中难以“归属”。最后,我讨论了未来的前景。通过将文化经济观点纳入气候变化,人类生存和城市基础设施规划这一紧迫问题中,可以实现某种活力。在这些问题上,文化经济的多义性可以证明是建设性的,超越以技术为中心的市场“定位”和对如何最佳地“绿化”我们城市的冷淡假设-取而代之的是人种学方面的问题,即人类如何获取,使用,交换和珍视金融和作为道德和社会存在的物质资源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号