...
首页> 外文期刊>Geographical analysis >Evaluating an Entropy-Maximizing Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Split-Ticket Voting in New Zealand, 1999
【24h】

Evaluating an Entropy-Maximizing Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Split-Ticket Voting in New Zealand, 1999

机译:评估生态推理问题的最大熵解:1999年在新西兰进行的票务分离投票

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

For geographers, one important aspect of the ecological inference problem relates to the analysis of spatial variations in individual behavior. Obtaining estimates of this behavior, in the absence of direct data, is often difficult, and the “solution” to the ecological inference problem propounded by G. King is not relevant in all circumstances. An alternative, using a different approach, has been used for some time in electoral studies but has lacked “real” data against which to assess the accuracy of its estimates. The availability of such data for New Zealand's 1999 general election allows such an assessment to be made—with very favourable results. The estimates are then used to test hypotheses regarding the spatial variation in split-ticket voting, again with considerable success.
机译:对于地理学家而言,生态推理问题的一个重要方面涉及对个人行为的空间变化进行分析。在没有直接数据的情况下,获取这种行为的估计值通常很困难,并且由G. King提出的解决生态推理问题的“解决方案”并非在所有情况下都适用。在选举研究中使用替代方案的方法已经使用了一段时间,但缺少评估其估计准确性的“真实”数据。新西兰在1999年大选中获得了这些数据,因此可以进行这样的评估-结果非常好。然后,将这些估计值用于测试有关票务分割中空间变化的假设,同样取得了相当大的成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号