首页> 外文期刊>Geoforum >Revisiting social natures: People-elephant conflict and coexistence in Sri Lanka
【24h】

Revisiting social natures: People-elephant conflict and coexistence in Sri Lanka

机译:重新审视社会性质:斯里兰卡的人文冲突与共处

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper examines human-wildlife conflict in and around protected areas to reflect on long-standing questions in conservation social science about protected areas and fortress thinking. It develops a more-than-human political ecology of human-elephant cohabitation and conflict in Sri Lanka to explore how changing sociomaterial conditions intersect to produce conservation and human-wildlife conflict in today's world. The paper's overarching argument is that fortress conservation is better understood as a relatively proximate cause of human-wildlife conflict and the other social impacts associated with the domain of conservation. Through its analyses, the paper deepens the critique of nature-society dualisms that is embedded in the appellation of 'fortress conservation' and offers insights that strengthen the reach and force of scholarship that tackles the persistent "appeal" of the "fortress" (Buscher, 2016, 115).
机译:本文考察了保护区内外的人类与野生动物之间的冲突,以反思保护社会科学中有关保护区和堡垒思想的长期存在的问题。它发展了斯里兰卡人类大象同居和冲突的非人类政治生态,以探索不断变化的社会物质条件如何相交,从而在当今世界产生保护和人类与野生动物的冲突。本文的首要论点是,要更好地理解要塞保护是人类与野生动物冲突以及与保护领域相关的其他社会影响的相对直接原因。通过其分析,本文加深了对“堡垒保护”称谓的自然-社会二元论的批判,并提供了见解,从而加强了解决“堡垒”的持久“诉求”的学术影响力和力量。 ”(Buscher,2016,115)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Geoforum》 |2019年第6期|182-190|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Edinburgh, Human Geog, Inst Geog, Drummond St, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号